Re: issue: optional parts in <message>?

"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
> 
> It would be nice if common interoperable representational types were
> described in a way that could be leveraged across all the XML
> activities, even those that do not use WSDL. Of course, if there wasn't
> a way to define "foreign" types in XML Schema, working groups like ours
> would be forced to come with their own "first class" definitions, but
> that doesn't seem to be the case any longer.

I am not a schema expert- could you please show the syntax for how
I would define a MIME type using XSD? See how it can be done easily
will help alleviate this aspect of my concerns at least!

Thanks,

Sanjiva.