Re: issue: optional parts in <message>?

Hi Mike,

Your link's broken (in fact all the links in the DIME/WSDL spec
are broken), but I looked in there and don't quite see it. Can
you please just post here the precise syntax for an operation
whose input message has two parts: a string and an image/gif.

Thanks!

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Deem" <mikedeem@microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Jeffrey Schlimmer"
<jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 7:13 AM
Subject: RE: issue: optional parts in <message>?


> See [1] for an example of how this can be done.
>
>   == Mike ==
>
> [1]
> http://indigo-sd/docs/bluebook/encapsulation/WSDL-Extension-for-DIME.doc
> _generated.htm#wsdl-extension-for-dime__toc7968299
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:01 PM
> > To: Jeffrey Schlimmer; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: issue: optional parts in <message>?
> >
> > "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
> > >
> > > It would be nice if common interoperable representational types were
> > > described in a way that could be leveraged across all the XML
> > > activities, even those that do not use WSDL. Of course, if there
> wasn't
> > > a way to define "foreign" types in XML Schema, working groups like
> ours
> > > would be forced to come with their own "first class" definitions,
> but
> > > that doesn't seem to be the case any longer.
> >
> > I am not a schema expert- could you please show the syntax for how
> > I would define a MIME type using XSD? See how it can be done easily
> > will help alleviate this aspect of my concerns at least!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >

Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 21:21:55 UTC