- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 18:40:27 -0700
- To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] wrote: >Another example would be the Purchase Order at [1]. The WSDL definition >would be: > > <message name="purchase-order"> > <part name="purchaseOrder" type="tns:PurchaseOrderType"/> > </message> > >but this is an oversimplification. In reality, the one liner above expands >into the 66 lines schema at [2]. I think you are questioning why we would >want to expose only the top of the iceberg (i.e. the top-level EIIs) via >the wsdl:part element. On that example, it might be more appropriate to >expose instead the 2nd level EIIs. I agree. It seems logical to either: (a) expose the 2nd-level EIIs via an explicit message EII and part EII (as WSDL 1.1 does), or (b) have operations reference a global element declaration (as we've been discussing). Enabling both feels unnecessarily complex. --Jeff
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 21:40:48 UTC