- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 14:04:33 -0700
- To: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0055.html
See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is:
Sandeep Kumar (fallbacks Mike McHugh, Johan Pauhlsson, Waqar
Sadiq, Adi Sakala)
2. Approval of minutes [6].
3. Review of Action items.
2002.05.23: GlenD to post email adding an issue: Are MEP's hard
coded in the spec, or can they be extended through
extensibility?
2002.05.23: JeffM to write up rationale for dropping operation
overloading.
DONE 2002.05.23: Philippe to update status section of the usage
scenarios
doc
2002.05.23: Philippe, Jonathan, Waqar to work on getting the usage
scenarios published
DONE 2002.05.23: Prasad, JeffS close the current issue, and have Prasad
open a new issue re-titled "Negative Acknowledgement"
DONE 2002.05.23: Roberto to take another round at updating his
extensibility
proposal
4. Abstract Model TF. New member: Sandeep.
5. Usage Scenarios.
Publication status.
6. This item intentionally left blank.
7. Issues. Issue list at [10]. Latest draft of the spec at [11].
No new issues
7a: Issue: Overloading operations
Awaiting action from JeffM?
7b. Issue: Extensibility/Open Content Model
Roberto's revised extensibility proposal (sorry, message doesn't appear
in the archive). Straw poll on whether to pursue simplifications or
accept the proposal as is.
7c. Issue: Optional parts in <message/>
Thread starts at [22]. What is the status of this issue?
7d: Issue: Negative Acknowledgement
Issue recast at [12].
7e. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
Any proposals to better specify these ops? Should we have a straw poll
on whether to close the issue or wait for a proposal?
7f. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [25] and proposed
a solution for some of them in [26], [27], and [28].
7g. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses?
Thread starts at [29].
7h. Issue: portType extensibility [30].
7i. Issue: service type [31].
- Jonathan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0223/01-minu
tes-irc-02-05-23.htm
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0029.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0149.html
[9]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/03/UC/wd-ws-desc-usecases-20020516.html
[10]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html
[11]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0144/02-part
1.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0232.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0075.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0076.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 17:05:58 UTC