- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:49:09 +0200
- To: Sandeep Kumar <sandkuma@cisco.com>
- CC: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webMethods.com>, Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
I still think we need a better name that "one-way" for operations that can return faults. One-way means no response. A fault is a response message (albeit a special type of response). Hence one-way with a response is not one-way, it's two-way. BTW, I'd like to point out that Prasad is now using the term "one-way-with-faults" [1], which is ok, I think. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0194.html Sandeep Kumar wrote: > Prasad:I support your viewpoint that "One way operations > SHOULD be able to return Faults."
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 04:50:04 UTC