Re: Revised extensibility proposal

I have to disagree. I think we should have a well-defined processing model that specifies precisely what a conforming WSDL processor should and should not do, otherwise we will end up with non-interoperable implementations.

Jean-Jacques.

"Sedukhin, Igor" wrote:

> 1. It's up to the WSDL processor to accept or ignore just about anything. We cannot mandate the implementation of the processor anyways, no matter what we say in a spec. <snip/>

Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 04:51:17 UTC