RE: issue: optional parts in <message>?

Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webMethods.com] writes
>>Now what if "part" d is a "foreign" type, for example some ASN.1
doodad? 
>>Assuming we have agreed on an appropriate definition of the asn.1 
>>namespace. 

>I think this is big assumption that will not scale in a generic way.
E.g. 
>any of the MIME types. 

As Sanjiva suggests, we should invest in making sure that the common,
interoperable representation types are described in a standard way,
whether described as the value of WSDL-specific part EII or as AII in an
XML Schema.

--Jeff

Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 21:25:10 UTC