W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

RE: issue: optional parts in <message>?

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 18:57:20 -0700
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC107062111@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] writes:
>In the grand scheme of things, I don't want to spend any more
>cycles arguing about this. However, I cannot accept changing this
>for WSDL 1.2 as this is a breaking change. Do you agree this is a
>WSDL 2.0 level function? (Does anyone else disagree?)

Have we run out of arguments yet? :)

Seriously, this is one of the first interesting design points we've
discussed, and I'd hate to see us rush out of it unnecessarily. Is the
concern: (a) that this is too large a change to make in the scope of
WSDL 1.2 no matter how much benefit it may provide, or (b) that it
results in the loss of important functionality? 

I don't have a good read on (a), but I think we've covered all the
significant points for (b).

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 21:58:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:23 UTC