- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:24:43 +0600
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
We can (and will) of course iterate on the final text. I'm asking to mark the issue as closed subject to writing it up properly (that applies for every issue IMO). Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr> To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 7:12 PM Subject: Re: import/include issue > In particular, can we close an issue before having seen the final > text? (I have seen WGs agree on a general resolution, but > reject/amend the proposed text.) > > Jean-Jacques. > > Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > > (Jonathan: Do we need a more formal process to close an issue or > > is this enough?)
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 09:27:52 UTC