- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:28:25 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002May/0002.html See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please send regrets to the administrative list. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda 1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is: Mike Ballantyne (fallback Mario Jeckle, Sandeep Kumar) 2. Approval of minutes [6]. 3. Review of Action items. 2002.04.04 Editors to get CVS requests to Philippe. DONE 2002.04.10 Sanjiva - add inconsistent use of port and endpoint to issues list 2002.04.11 Keith B. will write up descriptions for issues discussed in presentations and add to issue lists if not there yet. due date: next conference call. DONE 2002.04.11 Jeff Schlimmer Add UPNP example to use cases. DONE 2002.04.18 Sanjiva Add 5 new issues raised by Prasad in to the Issues list. 2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list 2002.04.25 Usage Scenarios document editors to publish a version for review 4. June FTF. Logistics information is at [7]. Is there a registration page? 5. Usage Scenarios document. Jeffery's UPnP uscase is at [16]. What is the status of review? 6. Issues. New draft of the spec at [8]. 6a. Issue: Open Content Model We were going to try to break the issue in two last week: - open content model of the WSDL document itself - extending the language, mustUnderstand Discussion centered on the difference between wsdl:required and soap:mustUnderstand. 6b. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Response from WSFL, XLANG authors reported at [9]. Igor questions the assertion that we aren't going to tackle a full-blown event mechanism at [10]. Any other progress on this issue? 6d. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [12] and proposed a solution for some of them in [13], [14], and [15]. 6c. Issue: import/include Sanjiva started the tread at [11]. Some support voiced for not doing include. No proposals for cleaning up import yet. 6e. Issue: Optional parts in <message/> Thread starts at [17]. 6f. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Thread starts at [18]. Is the discussion focused on addressing the issue, clarifying the issue, or about a different issue? I can't quite tell whether this issue is being actively discussed or not :-). - Jonathan -------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/ [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/ [5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/att-0186/01-minu tes.html [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/f2fJuneLogistics.html [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/att-0199/02-part 1.html [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0181.html [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0187.html [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0200.html [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0205.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 18:28:58 UTC