W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Agenda for 2 May 2002 WS Description WG

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 15:28:25 -0700
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59C05C06744@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Dial in information (members only):

See the public WG page [1] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [2] for administrative matters. 

If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.  Please send regrets to the
administrative list.


1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
      Mike Ballantyne (fallback Mario Jeckle, Sandeep Kumar)

2.  Approval of minutes [6].

3.  Review of Action items.
     2002.04.04 Editors to get CVS requests to Philippe. 
DONE 2002.04.10 Sanjiva - add inconsistent use of port and endpoint to 
                issues list 
     2002.04.11 Keith B. will write up descriptions for issues discussed

                in presentations and add to issue lists if not there
                due date: next conference call. 
DONE 2002.04.11 Jeff Schlimmer Add UPNP example to use cases. 
DONE 2002.04.18 Sanjiva Add 5 new issues raised by Prasad in to the
     2002.04.18 Waqar Add new use case raised on the mailing list 
     2002.04.25 Usage Scenarios document editors to publish a version

4.  June FTF.  Logistics information is at [7].  Is there a registration

5.  Usage Scenarios document.  Jeffery's UPnP uscase is at [16].  What
is the status of review?

6.  Issues.  New draft of the spec at [8].

6a. Issue: Open Content Model
We were going to try to break the issue in two last week:
  - open content model of the WSDL document itself
  - extending the language, mustUnderstand
Discussion centered on the difference between wsdl:required and

6b. Issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations?
Response from WSFL, XLANG authors reported at [9].  Igor questions the
assertion that we aren't going to tackle a full-blown event mechanism at
[10].  Any other progress on this issue?

6d. Issue(s): Non-SOAP HTTP Binding
Jeffrey refactored up the non-SOAP HTTP binding issues [12] and proposed
a solution for some of them in [13], [14], and [15].

6c. Issue: import/include
Sanjiva started the tread at [11].  Some support voiced for not doing
include.  No proposals for cleaning up import yet.

6e. Issue: Optional parts in <message/>
Thread starts at [17].

6f. Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses
Thread starts at [18].  Is the discussion focused on addressing the
issue, clarifying the issue, or about a different issue?  I can't quite
tell whether this issue is being actively discussed or not :-).

- Jonathan

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/
[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/f2fJuneLogistics.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0181.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0187.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0200.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0182.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0183.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0204.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0009.html 
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0205.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/0004.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Apr/0197.html

Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 18:28:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:22 UTC