w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2002 by subject

(no subject)

03 Oct 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

05 Dec 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

1.2: proposed rewording

1.2: Proposed rewording for definitions and notes

12 Dec 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

14 Nov 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

24 Oct 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

31 Oct 2002 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes

4.1 and 4.1 revised

4.1 and 4.2 idea

4.1 latest version

4.1 most important?

4.1 revised

4.1 revised -- more

5.1

5.1 and control of the logo usage

5.2

[html+css techniques] RE: layout tables

[techs] old, old draft of technology-specific checkpoints

Accessibility of protocols

ADA ruling

Agenda

Agenda - Regrets

Agenda time correction: the call is now at 2100 UTC (not 2000 UTC)

Apologies

Article about the experts whose help WCAG needs

Belated regrets

Bray-lee

Bray-lee Correction

Bray-Lee misposting apology

captions and descriptions

Checkpoint 1.1 - handling the rest of the comments

Checkpoint 1.1 Re-Draft.

Checkpoint 1.1, p.s.

Checkpoint 1.2 - handling comments

Checkpoint 2.3 Avoid causing the screen to flicker

Checkpoint 2.3 Avoid causing the screen to flicker.

Clarifaction please Re: Level 3 success criteria for checkpoint 1.2

Comment on WCAG 2.0: Scaling and stylizing text

Comments from George Kerscher on CAG 2.0

Comments on WCAG 2.0 (22 Aug 2002 draft)

Comments on WCAG 2.0 working draft

Comments on WD-WCAG20-20020822

Continued Comments on WD-WCAG20-20020822

Daylight Savings Time

draft for 4.1 and new developing standard

Drama is typically more intense, tightly constructed, economical, and cathartic than narrative*

DVD eeqwjOBz3l3f9J0xm

flash and sound-on-event

follow up - RDF techniques for WCAG 2.0

Friend, Professional automated homebusiness

Fwd: RE: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

Google and hidden text/links

Guideline 1 and Checkpoint 1.1. Items for comment.

Hebrew vowels and WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

Highlights from Call Today

I may be late ...

IBM Comments on WCAG 2.0 Public Draft 22 August 2002

image links and (text)boxes

Images and text equivalents

Interesting Article

Internet Standards Questionnaire

Join German Friend Finder

Judge Rules That Inaccessible Website Violates ADA

Late regrets -sorry

Late regrets for today

Level 3 success criteria for checkpoint 1.2

Level 3 success criteria for checkpoint 1.2 (UPDATED per discussion at 11/7 meeting)

Mailing list

Markup and explicit association: checkpoint 1.3 etc.

Meeting postponed

Minutes posted

More absurdity with captions and descriptions

Moving Conformance Claim

Multiple versions of content (including "final forms")

news: webaccessibile.org

note on WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 4.1

November 21 FTF

November 21 Minutes Posted

Numbering Success Criteria

Ooooops! Forgot to add the link

Organization of WCAG 2.0 and checklists

passcode not valid?

Personas

please ignore: Re: auto subscribe, w3c-wai-gl

Proposal for a new Appendix in WCAG 2.0

Proposal: substitute "provisions" for "success criteria" throughout document

questionnaire

rdf

RDF techniques

Regrets

Regrets for October 10th meeting

regrets for the next 2 meetings

regrets for this week

Regrets for this week and next

Regrets for this week's meeting

regrets for Thursday

Regrets for today

Regrets for tomorrow

Regrets, prospective and retrospective

Reposting of RE: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft in a readable format

Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

Request to Join

Requirements for Techniques: Draft 0.2

Retry: RE: Request for Review: WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

Review of WCAG 2.0 WD: structure found confusing, hiding impr ovements in simplicity

Review of WCAG 2.0 WD: structure found confusing, hiding improvem ents in simplicity

Review of WCAG 2.0 WD: structure found confusing, hiding improvements in simplicity

Review requirements in success criteria (was Re: 4.1 revised)

scope are we ready to discuss expanding?

SLD Web Design guidelines

some comments for WCAG 2

static links for current news items?

Subject: Sign language in the web

Suggested rewording for Checkpoint 1.1

Summary of Reviews of 22 August 2002 WCAG 2.0 WD

Sun's Review of WCAG 2.0 Working Draft

SVG Icons [Re: Guideline 3.4 comment (ralative vs. absolute units)]

test

The meaning and value of telephone conferences

Today's Minutes

upcoming F2F possibilities

Updated issues lists

W3C Weekly News - 10 December 2002

W3C Weekly News - 11 November 2002

W3C Weekly News - 15 October 2002

W3C Weekly News - 18 December 2002

W3C Weekly News - 18 November 2002

W3C Weekly News - 2 December 2002

W3C Weekly News - 25 November 2002

W3C Weekly News - 28 October 2002

W3C Weekly News - 4 November 2002

W3C Weekly News - 7 October 2002

WCAG 2.0 comments/suggestions

WCAG checkpoints and success criteria affecting design of technologies

WCAG conformance profiles

WCAG conformance profiles (claims vs. certificates)

WCAG conformance profiles (no plain text)

WCAG2 draft - question and (minor) comments

WCAG2 feedback

When?

Where does the "access declaration" metadata requirement belong?

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 05:02:58 UTC