Re: Numbering Success Criteria

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:22 PM
Subject: Numbering Success Criteria


>> ==========
>
> Option #3  include conformance level in brackets after each sequential
> numbering
>
> You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at the Minimum Level if:
>       1.1.1 [Minimum]  Non-text content that can be expressed in words has
a
>                 text-equivalent explicitly associated with it.
>       1.1.2 [Minimum]  Non-text content that can not be expressed in words
>                has a descriptive label provided as its text-equivalent.
>                 + The text equivalent should fulfill the same function as
the
>                 author intended for the non-text content (i.e. it presents
>                all of the intended information and/or achieves the same
>                function of the non-text content).
>
> You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at Level 2 if:
>       1.1.3 [Level 2] the text-equivalent has been reviewed and is
believed
>                 to fulfill the same function as the author intended for
the
>                 non-text content (i.e. it presents all of the intended
> information and/or
>                 achieves the same function of the non-text content)
>       1.1.4 [Level 2] a conformance claim associated with the content
asserts
>                 conformance to this checkpoint at level 2.
>
> ==========

This is more clear for me :-)

Roberto Scano
IWA/HWG EMEA Coordinator
W3C Advisory Committee Representative for IWA/HWG
International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild
http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org

Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 11:41:02 UTC