- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:40:53 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org> To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: Numbering Success Criteria >> ========== > > Option #3 include conformance level in brackets after each sequential > numbering > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at the Minimum Level if: > 1.1.1 [Minimum] Non-text content that can be expressed in words has a > text-equivalent explicitly associated with it. > 1.1.2 [Minimum] Non-text content that can not be expressed in words > has a descriptive label provided as its text-equivalent. > + The text equivalent should fulfill the same function as the > author intended for the non-text content (i.e. it presents > all of the intended information and/or achieves the same > function of the non-text content). > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at Level 2 if: > 1.1.3 [Level 2] the text-equivalent has been reviewed and is believed > to fulfill the same function as the author intended for the > non-text content (i.e. it presents all of the intended > information and/or > achieves the same function of the non-text content) > 1.1.4 [Level 2] a conformance claim associated with the content asserts > conformance to this checkpoint at level 2. > > ========== This is more clear for me :-) Roberto Scano IWA/HWG EMEA Coordinator W3C Advisory Committee Representative for IWA/HWG International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 11:41:02 UTC