- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:24:56 +1000
- To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- CC: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Lisa Seeman writes: > > I am suddenly getting more feedback on the vowels issue on a local level, > and we may even have some more interest form user agents offering support. > I would like to gain more consciences on a local level on what priority > level the success criteria should attain, and report back to the group. > Is this OK? Are there any objection to reopening the issue of priority level > for this success criteria? This is a good idea; the input might be quite valuable. Since the issue was never closed, it therefore remains open. > What time frame do we have for resolving this issue? How long do you think it will take to pursue your inquiries? After that, we can bring the issue to a meeting and either resolve it, or establish any further action items that might be needed. Members of the W3C's internationalization working group may also wish to contribute at some point (as Wendy noted at one of our meetings, they have an interest in various aspects of the guidelines, with this issue being one of them). The absolute requirement is that all issues be resolved before we proceed to last call. However, it would also be desirable to obtain some implementation experience before then. Thus if you have a preliminary indication of how long these valuable inquiries will take, we can schedule further treatment of the issue at an appropriate meeting thereafter. My suggestion would be that you post your findings to the list once the inquiries are concluded, and that the issue should then be placed on a meeting agenda.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 03:25:08 UTC