- From: Doyle <dburnett@sesa.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:35:16 -0800
- To: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I'd go for the CSUN conference! Doyle Burnett > From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> > Reply-To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:33:48 +1000 > To: Web Content Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Subject: Re: upcoming F2F possibilities > Resent-From: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:34:03 -0400 (EDT) > > > Eary this month, Wendy submitted the following request to the group. > In preparation for tomorrow's teleconference, if you have any > preference regarding these face to face meeting options, please post > your response to the list. > Wendy A Chisholm writes: >> >> Hello, >> >> At today's telecon we discussed possible dates and locations for future F2F >> meetings. Here is the information I promised: >> >> 1. W3C All Group Meeting (a.k.a. the Technical Plenary). 3 - 7 March, Royal >> Sonesta Hotel, Cambridge, MA USA >> 2. Conference on "Technology and Persons with Disabilities" (a.k.a. CSUN). >> 17-22 March, L.A., CA USA >> >> Information from last year's technical plenary is available. [1] One >> possibility is for a small group to attend the technical plenary and >> solicit feedback from other W3C groups then bring that feedback to a >> regular working group meeting that would occur after CSUN. >> >> Another possibility is to have two meetings with different goals. One >> could focus on technology-specifics (i.e., a working meeting similar to >> Linz) and the other could be regular meeting. >> >> Please send your preference for date and venue to me, Gregg, and >> Jason. Also, be sure to let us know if you support the idea of organizing >> two meetings (one at the plenary and one at csun). >> >> Thank you, >> --wendy >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/allgroupoverview.html >> >> -- >> wendy a chisholm >> world wide web consortium >> web accessibility initiative >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ >> /-- > >
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 14:33:48 UTC