- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:21:28 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI-GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I am working on an article for A List Apart <http://alistapart.com/> that will examine how WCAG 2.0 can be improved by the participation of specific topic experts. For example, if WAI wishes to write really credible and functional guidelines on how to edit a Web site for comprehensibility, WAI should have input from seasoned writers, editors, and experts on plain language. Any WCAG guideline related to design should not reach final stage without the active contribution of expertise from well-qualified Web designers. That sort of thing. The premise is that WCAG 2.0 will become a de facto requirement. 1.0 has lots of problems-- it's outdated; certain clauses contradict each other; it's hard to understand-- and we want to keep history from repeating itself. Since "the Web community" will be forced to comply with WCAG 2.0 or will do so voluntarily, their expert input is required in the standards-making process *now*. The WAI is, after all, nominally open to everyone. If successful, the outcome of the article will be an influx of people with topic expertise and an interest in accessibility who will give *truly expert* advice, which will reduce or eliminate the current trend of non-experts pretending they know enough about a dozen disparate topics to write and critique guidelines on those topics. Without topic experts contributing to the creation of the guidelines, the ultimate guidelines stand to be resisted or rejected outright by other topic experts. WAI has done a poor job so far of recruiting topic experts. I'm gonna fix that. SO: What I would like to hear are recommendations for which *types* of expertise or which *disciplines* WCAG needs contributions from. Feel free to map particular checkpoints against the particular expertise that is needed, because I have a hard time keeping all this stuff straight. (Rewriting the guidelines in plain language will be one of the areas of expertise I will write about.) I'm not asking for *names of people* or organizations, just subject areas and disciplines. This is on the level and for real. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ <http://joeclark.org/book/>
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 12:21:31 UTC