- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:12:14 +1100
- To: Michael Cooper <michaelc@watchfire.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-wai-gl@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Here is another round of comments from me. Michael Cooper writes: > > Techniques must be structured in such a way that multiple views can be > achieved, including in particular: > > - Checklists > > - Test files > > - Techniques by conformance level > > - Others? Techniques by technology version and/or implementation status Unabridged techniques documents (should be inserted after "checklists" in the above list) > > > Techniques should be testable whenever possible and must declare whether > they are considered testable. Guidance about testing methods may be > provided. > > Techniques must [should?] include or link to test cases showing positive and > negative implementations of the technique. [This implies the creation of a > test suite that exists at a layer below the Techniques layer.] Some techniques related to the "additional ideas" sections may not be > testable, in which circumstances it may not be possible to provide > test cases. Perhaps we should say that examples of (positive and, > optionally, negative) > implementations of the technique must be provided and that if the > technique is regarded as testable, these examples must be adequate > to serve as test cases. I wouldn't insist on this change, however, though it does make the > requirement a little more precise.
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 21:12:23 UTC