- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:43:42 -0500 (EST)
- To: john_slatin <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>
- cc: "'Wendy A Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Wendy, I find all numbering schemes a bit confusing and arbitrary, so don't find anything much to pick between them. The only thing that seems important to me is that they each have a URI (and that's for machine-processing, so it doesn't matter what it seems like to a person, although it is arguably helpful if they match). (I do think this is a good thing to do, so a second for John's vote of thanks :) Cheers Chaals On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, john_slatin wrote: > >Wendy, > >Thanks for this. On first pass I found all four methods confusing as JAWS >read your message aloud. On the next pass, though, I found Method 4 less >confusing than the other three, so I'll go with that one for now. > >Are such numbering schemes likely to prove difficult for people with >learning disabilities or other cognitive difficulties? Are there other >methods that we should be considering, either instead of these or as >supplements, to help people keep track of where they are in the scheme of >things? > >John >
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 11:43:45 UTC