- From: Michael Cooper <michaelc@watchfire.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:58:27 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I like Option 4 best, because I think conformance level should be explicitly part of the numbering and I found it more readable than option 2 (hard to tell which number was which part). I might parse it out differently with regard to dots, dashes, and other separators but the general approach works for me. Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: Wendy A Chisholm [mailto:wendy@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:22 AM > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Numbering Success Criteria > > > > At the July face to face, we agreed to uniquely number each success > criterion. The editors have come up with 4 proposals for > discussion. Please choose the method you prefer or suggest > an alternative. > > Option #1: Number success criteria sequentially (no conformance > information): > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at the Minimum Level if: > 1.1.1 Non-text content that can be expressed in words has a > text-equivalent explicitly associated with it. > 1.1.2 Non-text content that can not be expressed in words has a > descriptive label provided as its text-equivalent. > + The text equivalent should fulfill the same > function as the > author intended for the non-text content (i.e. > it presents > all of the intended information and/or > achieves the same > function of the non-text content). > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at Level 2 if: > 1.1.3 The text-equivalent has been reviewed and is believed to > fulfill the same function as the author > intended for the > non-text content > (i.e. it presents all of the intended > information and/or > achieves the same function of the non-text content) > 1.1.4 A conformance claim associated with the content asserts > conformance to this checkpoint at level 2. > > ====== > > Option #2 structure the numbering to reflect the conformance > level of each > checkpoint. > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at the Minimum Level if: > 1.1.1.1 Non-text content that can be expressed in words has a > text-equivalent explicitly associated with it. > 1.1.1.2 Non-text content that can not be expressed in > words has a > descriptive label provided as its text-equivalent. > + The text equivalent should fulfill the > same function as the > author intended for the non-text content > (i.e. it presents > all of the intended information and/or > achieves the same > function of the non-text content). > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at Level 2 if: > 1.1.2.1 The text-equivalent has been reviewed and is > believed to > fulfill the same function as the author > intended for the > non-text content. (i.e. it presents all > of the intended > information and/or achieves the same > function of the > non-text content) > 1.1.2.2 A conformance claim associated with the content asserts > conformance to this checkpoint at level 2. > > ========== > > Option #3 include conformance level in brackets after each sequential > numbering > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at the Minimum Level if: > 1.1.1 [Minimum] Non-text content that can be expressed > in words has a > text-equivalent explicitly associated with it. > 1.1.2 [Minimum] Non-text content that can not be > expressed in words > has a descriptive label provided as its > text-equivalent. > + The text equivalent should fulfill the same > function as the > author intended for the non-text content > (i.e. it presents > all of the intended information and/or > achieves the same > function of the non-text content). > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at Level 2 if: > 1.1.3 [Level 2] the text-equivalent has been reviewed > and is believed > to fulfill the same function as the author > intended for the > non-text content (i.e. it presents all of the > intended > information and/or > achieves the same function of the non-text content) > 1.1.4 [Level 2] a conformance claim associated with the > content asserts > conformance to this checkpoint at level 2. > > ========== > > Option #4 Identify criteria by letter (e.g., a-c, instead of 1-3) and > include conformance level > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at the Minimum Level if: > 1.1-1a Non-text content that can be expressed in words has a > text-equivalent explicitly associated with it. > 1.1-1b Non-text content that can not be expressed in > words has a > descriptive label provided as its text-equivalent. > + The text equivalent should fulfill the > same function as the > author intended for the non-text content > (i.e. it presents > all of the intended information and/or > achieves the same > function of the non-text content). > > You will have successfully met Checkpoint 1.1 at Level 2 if: > 1.1-2a The text-equivalent has been reviewed and is > believed to > fulfill the same function as the author > intended for the > on-text content (i.e. it presents all > of the intended > information and/or achieves the same > function of the > non-text content) > 1.1-2b A conformance claim associated with the content asserts > conformance to this checkpoint at level 2. > > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ > /-- >
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 13:58:13 UTC