- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:41:58 +0100
- To: "John Slatin" <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>, "Lee Roberts" <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>, "'Lisa Seeman'" <lisa@UBaccess.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slatin" <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu> To: "Lee Roberts" <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>; "'Lisa Seeman'" <lisa@UBaccess.com> Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 5:55 PM Subject: Re: 5.2 >For example: >"The content uses technologies, including assistive technologies, that are available in multiple implementations for >different operating systems." > >Would this come close? I suggest to change it with: "The content use technologies, including assistive technologies, that are available in different operating systems" I think that "multiple implementations" could be difficoult to understand and to define, also is to explain well about "different opertating systems". For example, if i have a tecnology that works for Windows 98/2000/XP i respect the request because it is available in three different operating systems. But the request must be focused that my content will be usable in Windows and Mac, for example.
Received on Monday, 30 December 2002 12:42:24 UTC