- From: john_slatin <john_slatin@forum.utexas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:56:38 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I'd like to suggest some changes in wording for Wendy's proposal #4. The
suggestion for item b is merely editorial; the suggestion for item c may be
considered substantive.
Wendy wrote:
Proposal #4
rewrite the minimum to read:
1. At least one of the following is true:
a. content does not flicker or flash.
b. flickering or flashing of content is not between 3 Hz and 55 Hz.
[js]: Proposed rewording for item b: "Content does not flicker or flash in
the range between 3 and 55 Hz (cycles) per second."
c. if flicker is unavoidable, the user is warned of the flicker before
they go to the content, and as close a version of the content as is
possible without flicker is provided.
[js]: Proposed rewording for item c: "If flicker is unavoidable, users are
given advance notice and a method of avoiding the flickering content is
provided. An equivalent alternative that does not flicker is available."
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Institute for Technology & Learning
University of Texas at Austin
1 University Station G9600
FAC 248C
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.ital.utexas.edu
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 09:56:42 UTC