"Package"
21 January 2000 Face to Face logistics
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-03.txt
XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations
Schema definitions according to 19991217 Schema draft, Part 1
Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
- Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
- Latest Draft (Was: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1)
SignedInfo Type Attribute
latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217
Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing
- Re: Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing
- Re: Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing
An Xpath-based Solution
9991216 Minutes
Re: Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's.
16 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda
Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's.
Comments Section
xmldsig questions
- Re: xmldsig questions
- RE: xmldsig questions
- RE: xmldsig questions
- RE: xmldsig questions
- RE: xmldsig questions
- RE: xmldsig questions
Chair Announce: Latest Draft on the site
Problems with changing from document order
991209 minutes
A proposal re Object/Manifest/etc.
9 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda
Re:Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: T
Interim Syntax & Processing Draft
Face to Face 21 January 2000
Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )
- Re:Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )
- RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )
Comments for Transform
991202 ConCall Minutes
XML-Signature Working Draft
2 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda
Re: XML Signature Feedback Requested
Chair Announce: Face-to-Face Meeting: January 2st
Re: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!)
RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
The real crux...
RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints
Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints
Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects
- RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects
- Re: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects
- RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects
- RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects
Validity of signing n out of m items
Hash algorithms - section 5.2 of the core specification
Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM
RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
- RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
- RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
- RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
- RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
- RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
- Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...)
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-02.txt
Simplified Syntax
Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-s tandard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')
Re: AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number)
The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints'
- RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints'
Transforms are a mandatory part of processing (was RE: 991118 Tel econ Minutes)
Comments on WD-xmldsig-core-19991116
991118 Telecon Minutes
Bridge Now Open
Have we lost track? (re:location and transforms)
Re:AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn
18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number)
- Call Problem
- AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number)
New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html
Draft Minutes
Resources, Objects, Data, and Things
XSLT and XPath Become W3C Recommendations
Normative URNS (from IANA, PEM or IPSEC)
Re: Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT!
RE: Latest draft and Schema / DTD
Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD
- Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD
- Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD
- Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD
Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
- RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo
Re:URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be
Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, wa
Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0
Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE:
Re:AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca
Correction to 19991022
ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location
- AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location
- Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location
- Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location
minutes of 4 November 1999 telecon
4 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda / IETF Agenda
IBM Canonicalization Code
Context dependency of Canonicalizatoin
Draft XMLDSIG WG Meeting Agenda
Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed
PKCS-7 Signature (and Envelope)
How will the proliferation of micro-devices affect what can be re quired by specs?
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt
conaonicalization & dsig code
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt
Easy to have multiple signatures?
Parameterization of Transforms
Location=""
Putting ObjectReferences First
Minutes 99-October-28
- Frag ID's in URI, was RE: Minutes 99-October-28
- RE: Minutes 99-October-28
- RE: Minutes 99-October-28
- Re: Minutes 99-October-28
Telecon passcode invalid
First Stab at Glossary
Location shouldn't be signed!
- Re: Location shouldn't be signed!
XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging?
Volunteer to do an XML schema
Namespaces and URNs
Namespace, URIs, and other institutionalized names
28 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda
Parser-less verifiers
Re: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct
Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax
- RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax
- RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax
- RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax
- RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax
XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- RE: XML and canonicalization
- Re[2]: XML and canonicalization
Source on Signer Authentication
RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archivin g)
Canonicalization
- RE: Canonicalization
- Re: Canonicalization
- RE: Canonicalization
- RE: Canonicalization
- Re: Canonicalization
- RE: Canonicalization
XSLT and XSL
Important: 21-Oct-1999 Teleconference Minutes
Suggested Corrections to 10/20/99 WD
Signer Authentication
21 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda
XMLDSig Core Published as W3C Tech Report
XMLDSIG WG November Meeting at IETF Scheduled
Editorial Convention Rules #2
Editorial Conventions Questions
Null Canonicalization Algorithm
- Re: Null Canonicalization Algorithm
- RE: Null Canonicalization Algorithm
- RE: Null Canonicalization Algorithm
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-00.txt
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-02.txt
Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft
Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML
FYI: Fragments and MIME/Types
Suggested Defaults Guidelines
Algorithm Specifiction/Parameters/Value
Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality
DSA and SHA-1 (was RE: Parameters and Algorithms. )
Signature Minutes 99-October-14
FYI: XML v DCOM
Parameters and Algorithms.
- Re: Parameters and Algorithms.
- RE: Parameters and Algorithms.
- RE: Parameters and Algorithms.
- RE: Parameters and Algorithms.
- RE: Parameters and Algorithms.
- Re: Parameters and Algorithms.
Re: Transformations
Re: draft updates
14 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda
Suggested Security Considerations Section
[Moderator Action] Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3
parameters (was RE: latest edits )
RE: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4. 3.3
First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3
- Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3
- Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3
- Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3
RE: minimal canonicalization
algorithm parameters
Hashing of <0bject> </object>
First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT
- RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT
- RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT
latest edits
- RE: latest edits
- RE: latest edits
- RE: latest edits
- RE: latest edits
- RE: latest edits
- RE: latest edits
- RE: latest edits
SignedInfo c14nAlg
Signature Syntax and Processing Overview section
99-October-07 Minutes
HMAC algorithm definition
Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes
- RE: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes
- RE: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes
Partial Signature Syntax Overview ection
7 Oct 99 Con Call reminder and agenda
CA: Requirements Document Advancement
Non-repudiation
core-991001: HMAC-SHA1
Comments on core-991001
- Re: Comments on core-991001
- RE: Comments on core-991001
- Re: Comments on core-991001
- RE: Comments on core-991001
- RE: Comments on core-991001
Suggested top level ToC for Syntax and Procesing document
Meeting at IETF 46 in November, Washington DC
draft resulting from 990930 call
- RE: draft resulting from 990930 call
- Re:draft resulting from 990930 call
- RE: draft resulting from 990930 call
- RE: draft resulting from 990930 call