- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:37:26 -0400
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I had a meeting with TimBL and others yesterday to get clarity on a couple of W3C policies and requirements over specifications, one of which was namespace policy. This tends to be a rather heated/religious issue, but at least I have something that I and others reference -- or even take issue with. <smile> You'll note one of the characteristics of this policy in the W3C context is the W3C's commitment to maintaining our URIs, which I think is a good thing. Regardless, the namespace policy requires "http://www.w3.org/1999/$something" and I expect I can get approval for a namespace shorter than the one I originally proposed along the lines of http://www.w3.org/1999/10/sig or even http://www.w3.org/1999/sig if we don't expect to issue different versions that need to co-exist and have normative changes in their meaning within the space of a year. One could even mix a version number in there, but I'm hesitant to propose that. This discussion also has some ramifications on the URNs that we are presently using, which I will address in the next message. Forwarded Text ---- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:43:13 -0500 From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> To: chairs@w3.org Subject: Re: Namespace URIs and other institutionalized names Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > It might be nice if we had a policy/mechanism that allowed us > to delegate this decision, or a policy/mechanism that > allowed all namespace identifiers to be chosen in a similar > fashion, but we (currently) don't. As a result of some internal discussions, TimBL has written down some of the policy that has been emerging in his mind. You are hereby notified of the policy in: URIs for W3C namespaces Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director $Id: nsuri.html,v 1.10 1999/10/26 20:10:04 timbl Exp $ http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri Feel free to cite it in public forums, and feel free to discuss, e.g. the philosophical aspects of URIs and persistence in the uri@w3.org forum, which is archived at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/ (hmm... the RDF IG is possibly another relevant forum, due to the digital library and other metadata issues.) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ tel:+1-512-310-2971 (office, mobile) mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org (put your tel# in the Subject:) End Forwarded Text ---- _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 1999 17:37:33 UTC