w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from October to December 1999 by author

Adam Prince

• RE: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn (Thursday, 18 November)

Andreas Schmidt

• Re: Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )) (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: Interim Syntax & Processing Draft (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re:Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re:draft resulting from 990930 call (Tuesday, 5 October)

Andreas Siglreithmayr

• Location shouldn't be signed! (Thursday, 28 October)

Barb Fox (Exchange)

• RE: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• RE: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• RE: Telecon passcode invalid (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax (Tuesday, 26 October)
• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax (Monday, 25 October)
• RE: Comments on core-991001 (Tuesday, 5 October)
• RE: RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels (Friday, 1 October)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax (Saturday, 30 October)

Brown, Sam

• RE: latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217 (Friday, 17 December)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)

Bugbee, Larry

• Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) (Tuesday, 7 December)
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (Wednesday, 24 November)

by way of

• XML-Signature Working Draft (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re:AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca (Wednesday, 10 November)

Chris Smithies

• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Non-repudiation (Wednesday, 6 October)

Dan Geer

• FYI: XML v DCOM (Thursday, 14 October)

Daniel LaLiberte

• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? (Monday, 6 December)
• Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed) (Wednesday, 10 November)

Daniel Veillard

• Re: XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations (Tuesday, 21 December)

David Burdett

• RE: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Easy to have multiple signatures? (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4. 3.3 (Monday, 11 October)
• RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT (Friday, 8 October)

david.solo@citicorp.com

• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Friday, 19 November)
• Have we lost track? (re:location and transforms) (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Null Canonicalization Algorithm (Wednesday, 20 October)
• RE: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft (Saturday, 16 October)
• Hashing of <0bject> </object> (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call (Tuesday, 5 October)
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call (Tuesday, 5 October)

dee3@us.ibm.com

• Re: Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing (Saturday, 25 December)
• XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations (Monday, 20 December)
• Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing (Friday, 17 December)
• 16 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 16 December)
• Comments Section (Wednesday, 15 December)
• 9 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 9 December)
• Interim Syntax & Processing Draft (Wednesday, 8 December)
• 2 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number) (Friday, 19 November)
• 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number) (Thursday, 18 November)
• minutes of 4 November 1999 telecon (Friday, 5 November)
• 4 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda / IETF Agenda (Thursday, 4 November)
• Draft XMLDSIG WG Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 2 November)
• 28 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Algorithm Specifiction/Parameters/Value (Friday, 15 October)
• Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: Suggested Security Considerations Section (Wednesday, 13 October)
• 14 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Suggested Security Considerations Section (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Partial Signature Syntax Overview ection (Thursday, 7 October)
• 7 Oct 99 Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 7 October)
• Suggested top level ToC for Syntax and Procesing document (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Meeting at IETF 46 in November, Washington DC (Monday, 4 October)

Denis Pinkas

• Re: Non-repudiation (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Non-repudiation (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Non-repudiation (Tuesday, 12 October)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• "Package" (Wednesday, 29 December)
• 21 January 2000 Face to Face logistics (Tuesday, 28 December)
• Re: XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217 (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: SignedInfo Type Attribute (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform (Thursday, 9 December)
• A proposal re Object/Manifest/etc. (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!! (Thursday, 9 December)
• Face to Face 21 January 2000 (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: XML-Signature Working Draft (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Validity of signing n out of m items (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• IBM Canonicalization Code (Wednesday, 3 November)
• conaonicalization & dsig code (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Parameterization of Transforms (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Location="" (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Putting ObjectReferences First (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Easy to have multiple signatures? (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Location shouldn't be signed! (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: XML and canonicalization (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Re: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: minimal canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Non-repudiation (Monday, 25 October)
• XML and canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Null Canonicalization Algorithm (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Namespaces (Was: Re: Canonicalization) (Sunday, 24 October)
• Re: Canonicalization (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: Suggested Corrections to 10/20/99 WD (Friday, 22 October)
• Re: Canonicalization (Friday, 22 October)
• Important: 21-Oct-1999 Teleconference Minutes (Thursday, 21 October)
• 21 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: Editorial Convention Rules #2 (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: Null Canonicalization Algorithm (Wednesday, 20 October)
• XMLDSIG WG November Meeting at IETF Scheduled (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Suggested Defaults Guidelines (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: draft updates (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: Two questions about Location (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: parameters (was RE: latest edits ) (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: latest edits (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Non-repudiation (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Non-repudiation (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• SignedInfo c14nAlg (Friday, 8 October)
• Signature Syntax and Processing Overview section (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Non-repudiation (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: core-991001: HMAC-SHA1 (Wednesday, 6 October)

Ed Simon

• Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's. (Thursday, 16 December)
• RE: Comments Section (Wednesday, 15 December)
• RE: NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform (Thursday, 9 December)
• How will the proliferation of micro-devices affect what can be re quired by specs? (Monday, 1 November)
• RE: Volunteer to do an XML schema (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Parser-less verifiers (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Canonicalization (Sunday, 24 October)
• RE: minimal canonicalization (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT (Friday, 8 October)
• First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: SignedInfo c14nAlg (Friday, 8 October)
• Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes (Thursday, 7 October)

EKR

• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Wednesday, 6 October)

Eric Rescorla

• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 14 December)

Greg Whitehead

• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Sunday, 14 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: minutes of 4 November 1999 telecon (Friday, 5 November)
• PKCS-7 Signature (and Envelope) (Monday, 1 November)
• RE: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: minimal canonicalization (Tuesday, 12 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: SignedInfo c14nAlg (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes (Thursday, 7 October)
• core-991001: HMAC-SHA1 (Tuesday, 5 October)
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call (Tuesday, 5 October)

Gregor Karlinger

• Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Schema definitions according to 19991217 Schema draft, Part 1 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: SignedInfo Type Attribute (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Schema definitions according to 19991217 Schema draft, Part 1 (Monday, 20 December)
• Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 (Monday, 20 December)
• SignedInfo Type Attribute (Monday, 20 December)

Hiroshi Maruyama

• Context dependency of Canonicalizatoin (Wednesday, 3 November)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-03.txt (Tuesday, 28 December)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-02.txt (Monday, 22 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt (Monday, 1 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt (Friday, 29 October)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-00.txt (Tuesday, 19 October)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-02.txt (Monday, 18 October)

jean-luc.champion@central-europe.basf.org

• Re: XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations (Tuesday, 21 December)

Jim Schaad (Exchange)

• Comments on WD-xmldsig-core-19991116 (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Parameterization of Transforms (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: Putting ObjectReferences First (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: Easy to have multiple signatures? (Friday, 29 October)
• Location="" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Putting ObjectReferences First (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• RE: Canonicalization (Friday, 22 October)
• Canonicalization (Thursday, 21 October)
• RE: Null Canonicalization Algorithm (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Null Canonicalization Algorithm (Tuesday, 19 October)
• RE: Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• Parameters and Algorithms. (Wednesday, 13 October)
• RE: Comments on core-991001 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Comments on core-991001 (Tuesday, 5 October)

John Boyer

• RE: An Xpath-based Solution (Friday, 17 December)
• An Xpath-based Solution (Friday, 17 December)
• RE: 9991216 Minutes (Friday, 17 December)
• Problems with changing from document order (Thursday, 9 December)
• NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform (Thursday, 9 December)
• THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!! (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )) (Wednesday, 8 December)
• RE: Comments for Transform (Tuesday, 7 December)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Monday, 6 December)
• RE: Comments for Transform (Monday, 6 December)
• RE: Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Wednesday, 24 November)
• The real crux... (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: 991118 Telecon Minutes (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Saturday, 20 November)
• Simplified Syntax (Saturday, 20 November)
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Saturday, 20 November)
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Friday, 19 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Friday, 19 November)
• The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Simplified syntax proposal, was RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca (Thursday, 11 November)
• Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: Parameterization of Transforms (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: Location="" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Parameterization of Transforms (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Telecon passcode invalid (Thursday, 28 October)
• ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! (Thursday, 28 October)
• Frag ID's in URI, was RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Thursday, 28 October)
• Telecon passcode invalid (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Monday, 25 October)
• Source on Signer Authentication (Friday, 22 October)
• RE: Important: 21-Oct-1999 Teleconference Minutes (Thursday, 21 October)
• RE: Canonicalization (Thursday, 21 October)
• RE: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML (Thursday, 21 October)
• Signer Authentication (Thursday, 21 October)
• RE: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Two questions about Location (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: Transformations (Thursday, 14 October)
• Two questions about Location (Wednesday, 13 October)
• First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 (Sunday, 10 October)
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call (Tuesday, 5 October)

John Ross

• Re: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax (Tuesday, 26 October)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• Latest Draft (Was: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: SignedInfo Type Attribute (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing (Tuesday, 21 December)
• RE: An Xpath-based Solution (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: xmldsig questions (Monday, 20 December)
• latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217 (Friday, 17 December)
• 9991216 Minutes (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's. (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: A proposal re Object/Manifest/etc. (Monday, 13 December)
• Chair Announce: Latest Draft on the site (Friday, 10 December)
• 991209 minutes (Thursday, 9 December)
• 991202 ConCall Minutes (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Re[2]: The real crux... (Tuesday, 30 November)
• RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects (Monday, 29 November)
• Chair Announce: Face-to-Face Meeting: January 2st (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Simplified Syntax (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Friday, 19 November)
• 991118 Telecon Minutes (Thursday, 18 November)
• Bridge Now Open (Thursday, 18 November)
• Call Problem (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Resources, Objects, Data, and Things (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Draft Minutes (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• XSLT and XPath Become W3C Recommendations (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Normative URNS (from IANA, PEM or IPSEC) (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT! (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Namespaces and URNs (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 (Monday, 1 November)
• RE: Parameterization of Transforms (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Parameterization of Transforms (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Location="" (Friday, 29 October)
• Easy to have multiple signatures? (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Friday, 29 October)
• Re: Location="" (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: Putting ObjectReferences First (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: First Stab at Glossary (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• Minutes 99-October-28 (Thursday, 28 October)
• Re: Namespaces and URNs (Thursday, 28 October)
• XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging? (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Volunteer to do an XML schema (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Namespaces and URNs (Wednesday, 27 October)
• Namespace, URIs, and other institutionalized names (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archivin g) (Friday, 22 October)
• Namespaces (Was: Re: Canonicalization) (Friday, 22 October)
• XSLT and XSL (Thursday, 21 October)
• XMLDSig Core Published as W3C Tech Report (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Editorial Convention Rules #2 (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Editorial Conventions Questions (Tuesday, 19 October)
• RE: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft (Saturday, 16 October)
• Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft (Friday, 15 October)
• Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML (Friday, 15 October)
• FYI: Fragments and MIME/Types (Friday, 15 October)
• Signature Minutes 99-October-14 (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: Transformations (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Transformations (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: Suggested Security Considerations Section (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: Two questions about Location (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: draft updates (Wednesday, 13 October)
• RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT (Friday, 8 October)
• latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• 99-October-07 Minutes (Thursday, 7 October)
• CA: Requirements Document Advancement (Thursday, 7 October)
• RE: Comments on core-991001 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 (Tuesday, 5 October)
• draft resulting from 990930 call (Monday, 4 October)
• RE: RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels (Friday, 1 October)
• RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels (Friday, 1 October)

Lightning

• Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 (Thursday, 14 October)
• [Moderator Action] Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 (Tuesday, 12 October)

Mack Hicks

• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)

Marc Branchaud

• Re: The real crux... (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)

Mark Bartel

• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Monday, 22 November)
• Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-s tandard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Friday, 19 November)
• Transforms are a mandatory part of processing (was RE: 991118 Tel econ Minutes) (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Thursday, 18 November)
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Friday, 29 October)
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Algorithm Specifiction/Parameters/Value (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality (Friday, 15 October)
• DSA and SHA-1 (was RE: Parameters and Algorithms. ) (Thursday, 14 October)
• parameters (was RE: latest edits ) (Tuesday, 12 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• algorithm parameters (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: latest edits (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes (Thursday, 7 October)
• HMAC algorithm definition (Thursday, 7 October)

Matthew Appler

• RE: Who cares what MUST be signed? (Monday, 6 December)

Milton M. Anderson

• Re: Non-repudiation (Wednesday, 6 October)

Paul Grosso

• Re: XML Signature Feedback Requested (Monday, 29 November)

Peter Lipp

• AW: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Tuesday, 7 December)
• AW: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• AW: 991118 Telecon Minutes (Tuesday, 23 November)
• AW: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Saturday, 20 November)
• AW: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' (Saturday, 20 November)
• AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number) (Thursday, 18 November)
• AW: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn (Thursday, 18 November)
• AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• AW: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• PKCS#7(CMS)/XMLDSig (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Tuesday, 9 November)
• AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Tuesday, 9 November)
• AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Monday, 8 November)

Peter Norman

• RE: minimal canonicalization (Wednesday, 13 October)

Peter Sylvester

• RE: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)

Phillip M Hallam-Baker

• RE: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• RE: RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) (Wednesday, 8 December)
• RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) (Tuesday, 7 December)
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Monday, 29 November)
• RE: Namespaces and URNs (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: Parser-less verifiers (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct (Wednesday, 27 October)
• RE: XML and canonicalization (Monday, 25 October)
• RE: Canonicalization (Friday, 22 October)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. (Thursday, 14 October)
• RE: minimal canonicalization (Thursday, 14 October)

Prince, Adam

• RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects (Thursday, 25 November)
• Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Validity of signing n out of m items (Wednesday, 24 November)

rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

• Re:RE: An Xpath-based Solution (Monday, 20 December)
• Re:An Xpath-based Solution (Friday, 17 December)
• Re:9991216 Minutes (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re:THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!! (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re:RE: RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re:Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: T (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re:RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re:Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re[2]: Re[2]: The real crux... (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re[2]: The real crux... (Monday, 29 November)
• Re[2]:RE: 991118 Telecon Minutes (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re:RE: 991118 Telecon Minutes (Monday, 22 November)
• Re:Simplified Syntax (Monday, 22 November)
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM (Monday, 22 November)
• Re:991118 Telecon Minutes (Monday, 22 November)
• Re:RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Monday, 22 November)
• Re:AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo (Monday, 15 November)
• Re:URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, wa (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re:AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re:AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Monday, 8 November)
• Correction to 19991022 (Monday, 8 November)
• ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location (Monday, 8 November)
• Re[2]: XML and canonicalization (Thursday, 28 October)

Rich Ankney

• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. (Friday, 15 October)

Richard D. Brown

• RE: XML-Signature Working Draft (Friday, 3 December)

Richard Himes

• Suggested Corrections to 10/20/99 WD (Thursday, 21 October)

TAMURA Kent

• Re: Comments for Transform (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: Comments for Transform (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Comments for Transform (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Comments for Transform (Friday, 3 December)

tgindin@us.ibm.com

• RE: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• RE: xmldsig questions (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) (Wednesday, 1 December)
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Hash algorithms - section 5.2 of the core specification (Wednesday, 24 November)
• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax (Friday, 29 October)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)

Tim Bray

• Re: Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT! (Monday, 15 November)

Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III

• Re: Call Problem (Thursday, 18 November)
• Resources, Objects, Data, and Things (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD (Friday, 12 November)
• First Stab at Glossary (Thursday, 28 October)

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 December 1999 10:07:28 UTC