w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from October to December 1999 by date

Wednesday, 29 December 1999

• "Package" Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Tuesday, 28 December 1999

• 21 January 2000 Face to Face logistics Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-03.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 25 December 1999

• Re: Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing dee3@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 21 December 1999

• Latest Draft (Was: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: xmldsig questions Frederick Hirsch
• RE: xmldsig questions tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: xmldsig questions Barb Fox (Exchange)
• RE: xmldsig questions Peter Sylvester
• RE: xmldsig questions tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: xmldsig questions Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• Re: SignedInfo Type Attribute Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations Daniel Veillard
• Re: XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations jean-luc.champion@central-europe.basf.org
• Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 Gregor Karlinger
• Re: Schema definitions according to 19991217 Schema draft, Part 1 Gregor Karlinger
• Re: SignedInfo Type Attribute Gregor Karlinger
• RE: xmldsig questions Barb Fox (Exchange)
• Re: Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: An Xpath-based Solution Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 20 December 1999

• Re: xmldsig questions Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re:RE: An Xpath-based Solution rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: SignedInfo Type Attribute Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Schema definitions according to 19991217 Schema draft, Part 1 Gregor Karlinger
• Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1 Gregor Karlinger
• SignedInfo Type Attribute Gregor Karlinger

Friday, 17 December 1999

• RE: latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217 Brown, Sam
• latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing dee3@us.ibm.com
• RE: An Xpath-based Solution John Boyer
• Re:An Xpath-based Solution rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• An Xpath-based Solution John Boyer
• RE: 9991216 Minutes John Boyer

Thursday, 16 December 1999

• Re:9991216 Minutes rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• 9991216 Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's. Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• 16 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's. Ed Simon

Wednesday, 15 December 1999

• RE: Comments Section Ed Simon
• Comments Section dee3@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 14 December 1999

• xmldsig questions Frederick Hirsch

Monday, 13 December 1999

• Re: A proposal re Object/Manifest/etc. Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Friday, 10 December 1999

• Chair Announce: Latest Draft on the site Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 9 December 1999

• Problems with changing from document order John Boyer
• 991209 minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform Ed Simon
• Re: NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform John Boyer
• Re: Comments for Transform TAMURA Kent
• A proposal re Object/Manifest/etc. Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• 9 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re: THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!! Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re:THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!! rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Wednesday, 8 December 1999

• Re:RE: RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• RE: RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!! John Boyer
• Re:Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: T rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re:RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )) Andreas Schmidt
• Re: Interim Syntax & Processing Draft Andreas Schmidt
• Interim Syntax & Processing Draft dee3@us.ibm.com
• Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )) John Boyer

Tuesday, 7 December 1999

• RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• Re:Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• RE: Comments for Transform John Boyer
• Face to Face 21 January 2000 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? Andreas Schmidt
• AW: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) Peter Lipp
• Re: Comments for Transform TAMURA Kent
• Re: Comments for Transform TAMURA Kent
• Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ) Bugbee, Larry

Monday, 6 December 1999

• RE: Who cares what MUST be signed? Matthew Appler
• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? Daniel LaLiberte
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) John Boyer
• RE: Comments for Transform John Boyer

Friday, 3 December 1999

• Comments for Transform TAMURA Kent
• RE: XML-Signature Working Draft Richard D. Brown

Thursday, 2 December 1999

• Re: XML-Signature Working Draft Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• 991202 ConCall Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• XML-Signature Working Draft by way of
• 2 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re:Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) Andreas Schmidt

Wednesday, 1 December 1999

• AW: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) Peter Lipp
• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) Chris Smithies
• RE: Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) John Boyer
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) John Boyer
• Re: Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) John Boyer
• Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...) Daniel LaLiberte
• Re[2]: Re[2]: The real crux... rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Tuesday, 30 November 1999

• Re: Re[2]: The real crux... Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 29 November 1999

• Re[2]: The real crux... rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: XML Signature Feedback Requested Paul Grosso
• RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Chair Announce: Face-to-Face Meeting: January 2st Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) Phillip M Hallam-Baker

Sunday, 28 November 1999

• Re: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) Tim Berners-Lee

Friday, 26 November 1999

• Re: The real crux... Marc Branchaud
• Re: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects Marc Branchaud

Thursday, 25 November 1999

• RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects Prince, Adam

Wednesday, 24 November 1999

• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• The real crux... John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) John Boyer
• RE: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') Mark Bartel
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints Greg Whitehead
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints Bugbee, Larry
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints Chris Smithies
• Re: Validity of signing n out of m items Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects Greg Whitehead
• Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects Prince, Adam
• Validity of signing n out of m items Prince, Adam
• RE: Simplified Syntax John Boyer
• Hash algorithms - section 5.2 of the core specification tgindin@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 23 November 1999

• Re: Simplified Syntax Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') Mark Bartel
• AW: 991118 Telecon Minutes Peter Lipp
• RE: RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• Re[2]:RE: 991118 Telecon Minutes rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Monday, 22 November 1999

• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') Mark Bartel
• Re:RE: 991118 Telecon Minutes rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re:Simplified Syntax rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re:RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• RE: 991118 Telecon Minutes John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') Mark Bartel
• Re:991118 Telecon Minutes rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• RE: RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• Re:RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 20 November 1999

• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' John Boyer
• AW: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' Peter Lipp
• Simplified Syntax John Boyer
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' John Boyer
• AW: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' Peter Lipp

Friday, 19 November 1999

• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' John Boyer
• RE: Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') John Boyer
• Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-s tandard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints') Mark Bartel
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' david.solo@citicorp.com
• Re: AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number) dee3@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 18 November 1999

• The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints' John Boyer
• Transforms are a mandatory part of processing (was RE: 991118 Tel econ Minutes) Mark Bartel
• Comments on WD-xmldsig-core-19991116 Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• 991118 Telecon Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number) Peter Lipp
• Re: Call Problem Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
• RE: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn John Boyer
• Bridge Now Open Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Call Problem Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn Adam Prince
• AW: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn Peter Lipp
• Have we lost track? (re:location and transforms) david.solo@citicorp.com
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Mark Bartel
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Daniel LaLiberte

Wednesday, 17 November 1999

• Re:AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Thursday, 18 November 1999

• 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number) dee3@us.ibm.com
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Brian LaMacchia
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Greg Whitehead
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Marc Branchaud
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Greg Whitehead

Wednesday, 17 November 1999

• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Simplified syntax proposal, was RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Mark Bartel
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo david.solo@citicorp.com
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo david.solo@citicorp.com
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Marc Branchaud
• RE: New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Peter Lipp
• AW: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Peter Lipp
• New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Resources, Objects, Data, and Things Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Draft Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Mack Hicks
• Resources, Objects, Data, and Things Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Marc Branchaud
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Tuesday, 16 November 1999

• PKCS#7(CMS)/XMLDSig Peter Lipp
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Peter Lipp
• XSLT and XPath Become W3C Recommendations Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Monday, 15 November 1999

• Normative URNS (from IANA, PEM or IPSEC) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT! Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT! Tim Bray

Sunday, 14 November 1999

• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Greg Whitehead

Friday, 12 November 1999

• RE: Latest draft and Schema / DTD david.solo@citicorp.com
• Re: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: Latest draft and Schema / DTD David Burdett
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
• Re: Latest draft and Schema / DTD Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Greg Whitehead
• RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo Greg Whitehead

Thursday, 11 November 1999

• RE: AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca John Boyer
• Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo John Boyer

Wednesday, 10 November 1999

• Re:URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed) Daniel LaLiberte
• Re:AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca by way of

Tuesday, 9 November 1999

• Re[2]: Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, wa rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re[2]: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location Peter Lipp
• Re:AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: Namespaces and URNs Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location Peter Lipp
• Re[2]: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Monday, 8 November 1999

• Re:AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location Peter Lipp
• Correction to 19991022 rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us

Friday, 5 November 1999

• RE: minutes of 4 November 1999 telecon Greg Whitehead
• minutes of 4 November 1999 telecon dee3@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 4 November 1999

• 4 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda / IETF Agenda dee3@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 3 November 1999

• RE: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! John Boyer
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• IBM Canonicalization Code Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Context dependency of Canonicalizatoin Hiroshi Maruyama

Tuesday, 2 November 1999

• Draft XMLDSIG WG Meeting Agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed Andreas Schmidt

Monday, 1 November 1999

• PKCS-7 Signature (and Envelope) Greg Whitehead
• How will the proliferation of micro-devices affect what can be re quired by specs? Ed Simon
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• conaonicalization & dsig code Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Saturday, 30 October 1999

• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax Brian LaMacchia

Friday, 29 October 1999

• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax tgindin@us.ibm.com
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL John Boyer
• RE: Parameterization of Transforms Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL Mark Bartel
• RE: Parameterization of Transforms Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Putting ObjectReferences First Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Parameterization of Transforms John Boyer
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Parameterization of Transforms Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Parameterization of Transforms Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Location="" Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Location="" Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Putting ObjectReferences First Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Easy to have multiple signatures? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Minutes 99-October-28 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: Easy to have multiple signatures? David Burdett
• RE: Easy to have multiple signatures? Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Easy to have multiple signatures? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Thursday, 28 October 1999

• Re: Location="" Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Putting ObjectReferences First Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: First Stab at Glossary Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Location="" John Boyer
• Parameterization of Transforms John Boyer
• Location="" Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Putting ObjectReferences First Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 John Boyer
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 John Boyer
• RE: Minutes 99-October-28 Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Telecon passcode invalid John Boyer
• ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed! John Boyer
• Re[2]: XML and canonicalization rhimes@nmcourt.fed.us
• Frag ID's in URI, was RE: Minutes 99-October-28 John Boyer
• Minutes 99-October-28 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL John Boyer
• RE: Telecon passcode invalid Barb Fox (Exchange)
• Telecon passcode invalid John Boyer
• Re: Namespaces and URNs Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• First Stab at Glossary Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
• Re: Location shouldn't be signed! Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Location shouldn't be signed! Andreas Siglreithmayr
• Re: XML and canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 27 October 1999

• RE: Volunteer to do an XML schema Ed Simon
• RE: Namespaces and URNs Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• RE: Parser-less verifiers Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Volunteer to do an XML schema Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Namespaces and URNs Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Namespace, URIs, and other institutionalized names Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XML and canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• 28 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• Parser-less verifiers Ed Simon
• RE: XML and canonicalization Ed Simon
• RE: XML and canonicalization Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• RE: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL Mark Bartel
• RE: XML and canonicalization Mark Bartel
• Re: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: XML and canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XML and canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: XML and canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Tuesday, 26 October 1999

• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax Barb Fox (Exchange)
• Re: Non-repudiation Denis Pinkas
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax John Ross

Monday, 25 October 1999

• RE: XML and canonicalization Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL John Boyer
• RE: XML and canonicalization Ed Simon
• RE: XML and canonicalization Brown, Sam
• RE: XML and canonicalization Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• RE: Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax Barb Fox (Exchange)
• Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax Denis Pinkas
• XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: minimal canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Non-repudiation Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• XML and canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Null Canonicalization Algorithm Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: Canonicalization Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Sunday, 24 October 1999

• Re: Namespaces (Was: Re: Canonicalization) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Canonicalization Ed Simon

Friday, 22 October 1999

• Source on Signer Authentication John Boyer
• RE: minor naming point (why full names are important for archivin g) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Canonicalization Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• Namespaces (Was: Re: Canonicalization) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Suggested Corrections to 10/20/99 WD Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: Canonicalization Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Canonicalization Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Thursday, 21 October 1999

• RE: Important: 21-Oct-1999 Teleconference Minutes John Boyer
• RE: Canonicalization John Boyer
• Canonicalization Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• XSLT and XSL Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML John Boyer
• Important: 21-Oct-1999 Teleconference Minutes Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Suggested Corrections to 10/20/99 WD Richard Himes
• Signer Authentication John Boyer
• 21 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 20 October 1999

• RE: Null Canonicalization Algorithm Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• XMLDSig Core Published as W3C Tech Report Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Editorial Convention Rules #2 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: Null Canonicalization Algorithm david.solo@citicorp.com
• Re: Null Canonicalization Algorithm Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• XMLDSIG WG November Meeting at IETF Scheduled Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Tuesday, 19 October 1999

• Editorial Convention Rules #2 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Editorial Conventions Questions Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Null Canonicalization Algorithm Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-00.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 18 October 1999

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-02.txt Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 16 October 1999

• RE: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft david.solo@citicorp.com
• RE: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Friday, 15 October 1999

• RE: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft Greg Whitehead
• Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML Mark Bartel
• RE: Algorithm Specifiction/Parameters/Value Mark Bartel
• RE: Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality Mark Bartel
• RE: Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML John Boyer
• Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• FYI: Fragments and MIME/Types Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Suggested Defaults Guidelines Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Algorithm Specifiction/Parameters/Value dee3@us.ibm.com
• Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. Rich Ankney

Thursday, 14 October 1999

• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• DSA and SHA-1 (was RE: Parameters and Algorithms. ) Mark Bartel
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. Eric Rescorla
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. Eric Rescorla
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. Phillip M Hallam-Baker
• RE: minimal canonicalization Phillip M Hallam-Baker

Tuesday, 12 October 1999

• Re: Non-repudiation Denis Pinkas

Thursday, 14 October 1999

• Signature Minutes 99-October-14 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• FYI: XML v DCOM Dan Geer
• RE: Transformations Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Two questions about Location John Boyer
• RE: Transformations John Boyer
• Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 Lightning
• Re: draft updates Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. Eric Rescorla
• RE: Parameters and Algorithms. Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Parameters and Algorithms. EKR

Wednesday, 13 October 1999

• Parameters and Algorithms. Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Suggested Security Considerations Section dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re: Suggested Security Considerations Section Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Transformations Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Two questions about Location Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: draft updates Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• 14 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Two questions about Location Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Two questions about Location John Boyer
• Re: parameters (was RE: latest edits ) Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Suggested Security Considerations Section dee3@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 12 October 1999

• RE: minimal canonicalization Greg Whitehead

Wednesday, 13 October 1999

• RE: minimal canonicalization Peter Norman

Tuesday, 12 October 1999

• [Moderator Action] Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 Lightning
• parameters (was RE: latest edits ) Mark Bartel
• Re: latest edits Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Non-repudiation Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Non-repudiation Denis Pinkas

Monday, 11 October 1999

• Re: Non-repudiation Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4. 3.3 David Burdett

Sunday, 10 October 1999

• First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3 John Boyer

Friday, 8 October 1999

• RE: latest edits Mark Bartel
• RE: latest edits Mark Bartel
• RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: latest edits Greg Whitehead
• RE: minimal canonicalization Ed Simon
• RE: latest edits Mark Bartel
• RE: latest edits Ed Simon
• algorithm parameters Mark Bartel
• RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT Ed Simon
• RE: latest edits Mark Bartel
• Hashing of <0bject> </object> david.solo@citicorp.com
• RE: First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT David Burdett
• First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT Ed Simon
• Re: latest edits Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• RE: latest edits Greg Whitehead
• latest edits Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: SignedInfo c14nAlg Greg Whitehead
• RE: SignedInfo c14nAlg Ed Simon
• SignedInfo c14nAlg Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Signature Syntax and Processing Overview section Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Thursday, 7 October 1999

• 99-October-07 Minutes Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes Greg Whitehead
• RE: Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes Mark Bartel
• HMAC algorithm definition Mark Bartel
• Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes Ed Simon
• Partial Signature Syntax Overview ection dee3@us.ibm.com
• 7 Oct 99 Con Call reminder and agenda dee3@us.ibm.com
• CA: Requirements Document Advancement Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Comments on core-991001 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Comments on core-991001 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 6 October 1999

• RE: Comments on core-991001 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: Comments on core-991001 Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Non-repudiation Milton M. Anderson
• Re: Comments on core-991001 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: Non-repudiation Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Non-repudiation Chris Smithies
• Re: Comments on core-991001 EKR
• Re: Comments on core-991001 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• Re: core-991001: HMAC-SHA1 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

Tuesday, 5 October 1999

• RE: Comments on core-991001 Barb Fox (Exchange)
• Re: Comments on core-991001 Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• core-991001: HMAC-SHA1 Greg Whitehead
• Comments on core-991001 Jim Schaad (Exchange)
• Suggested top level ToC for Syntax and Procesing document dee3@us.ibm.com
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call John Boyer
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call david.solo@citicorp.com
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call david.solo@citicorp.com
• Re:draft resulting from 990930 call Andreas Schmidt
• RE: draft resulting from 990930 call Greg Whitehead

Monday, 4 October 1999

• Meeting at IETF 46 in November, Washington DC dee3@us.ibm.com
• draft resulting from 990930 call Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Friday, 1 October 1999

• RE: RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels Barb Fox (Exchange)
• RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 December 1999 10:07:28 UTC