- From: Greg Whitehead <gwhitehead@signio.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 16:36:54 -0700
- To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Did the proposal to fix the canonicalization algorithm used on SignedInfo, and eliminate 4.1, get rejected or just lost in the shuffle? -Greg -----Original Message----- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. [mailto:reagle@w3.org] Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 3:45 PM To: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG Subject: Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft I've prepared both versions of the document for advancement through the publication process of each institution. http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/WD-xmldsig-core-19991020.html http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-00.txt _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 15 October 1999 19:37:34 UTC