- From: John Boyer <jboyer@uwi.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 13:54:32 -0700
- To: "Jim Schaad (Exchange)" <jimsch@EXCHANGE.MICROSOFT.com>, "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>, "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <NDBBLAOMJKOFPMBCHJOIEEOACBAA.jboyer@uwi.com>
RE: Minutes 99-October-28See the first public draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmldsig-core-19991020.html John Boyer Software Development Manager UWI.Com -- The Internet Forms Company -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Schaad (Exchange) Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 1:39 PM To: 'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'; IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG Subject: RE: Minutes 99-October-28 > * Location - < 10 minutes > Leave an attribute but change name to HREF? > Make an element with an HREF attribute? > Make an element with URI content? > Is it mandatory to support a non-null Location? > > List proposal to allow the location to exist outside of > SignedInfo. Call wants to keep location in the > signature, it is a > URI (not necessarily a URL) and the call prefers the > employment of > redirection/indirection through URIs not this syntax. > Leave <ObjectReference Location="http://www.ietf.org"> as is. > Define null-location as <ObjectReference Location=""> > as referring > to this document, must be supported. Do we extend it to mean > "#ID". No: Location is URI (including null) or IDREF. > (Can anyone remember the reason why we just don't use > FragmentIDs?) > I must have missed something someplace -- When did location become an attribute rather than an element? All of the documents that I have put it as an attribute and a quick review of the mail still has it as an element. When did it become an element? jim
Received on Thursday, 28 October 1999 16:54:35 UTC