- From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:38:44 +0900
- To: "John Boyer" <jboyer@uwi.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Dave Solo" <dsolo@alum.mit.edu>
In message "RE: Comments for Transform"
on 99/12/07, "John Boyer" <jboyer@uwi.com> writes:
> Step #3 states that the node-set will be interpreted in document order,
> which is clearly defined in the XPath specification [1].
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#dt-document-order
No. Order in a set of attribute nodes or namespace nodes is
implementation-dependent.
In http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#dt-document-order
.... The relative order of namespace nodes is
implementation-dependent. The relative order of
attribute nodes is implementation-dependent. Reverse
document order is the reverse of document order.
--
TAMURA Kent @ Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM
Received on Thursday, 9 December 1999 10:37:40 UTC