- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 12:52:26 -0500
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Signature/Minutes/991202-tele.html
Participants
* Donald Eastlake 3rd, IBM
* Joseph Reagle, W3C
* Mark Bartel, JetForm
* John Boyer, UWI
* Ed Simon , Entrust Technologies Inc.
* John Boyer, UWI
* Barbara Fox, Microsoft
* Todd Vincent, GSU
* David Solo, Citigroup (regrets)
Review of Outstanding Action Items
Status of documents < 5 minutes
Requirements Document: As it is being proposed as an InformationalRFC,
it need not be IETF last call. Schiller reports he will bring it up to
IESG and expects action within a few weeks.
Core Syntax and Processing: Solo's been working on editorial issues
and clean up, will post something Thursday or Friday. Editors will
then try a slight re-org to try to provide clarity between
cryptographic syntax/processing and ObjectReference syntax/processing
Signature Syntax & Processing draft questions:
Securing Location/Transforms - < 20 minutes
Levels of indirection, Manifests, References, ...
Reagle: (working backwards):
* IETF/W3C Last Call end of January
* WG Last Call beginning of January
* Editors work on exposition/clarity as much as possible for January
last call such that we can take a stroll poll, address questions,
and document minority views on the basis of concepts rendered
clear (instead of ambiguities in the text.)
* Accrue implementation experience and possible interop testing.
Fox: XPath discussion has perhaps got us off the target, need to focus
on the specification and interoperable syntax and protocol. Getting in
to behavior can get confusing.
Bartel: realized that XPath is used for two things:
1. sign an ancestor of the signature element.
2. programmatic document definition
Boyer: The present spec fulfills his needs. Ways to do what Himes
needs to do to as well, just not in the core behavior/standardized.
[... light discussion/review no proposals or action items....]
ACTION Fox: will check with David about the Algorithm section and
perhaps make another pass through.
Con call restart next year. < 5 minutes
Editors should focus on clarifying the present spec.
Have the call on the 9th and 16th, Eastlake will notify if he doesn't
think we need a call that week.
Otherwise, start back up on January 6th
Face to Face meeting arrangements < 10 minutes
January 21 Friday after the RSA conference. Need to get details from
Rags and post by end of week.
_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.
Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 2 December 1999 12:52:26 UTC