- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 12:52:26 -0500
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Signature/Minutes/991202-tele.html Participants * Donald Eastlake 3rd, IBM * Joseph Reagle, W3C * Mark Bartel, JetForm * John Boyer, UWI * Ed Simon , Entrust Technologies Inc. * John Boyer, UWI * Barbara Fox, Microsoft * Todd Vincent, GSU * David Solo, Citigroup (regrets) Review of Outstanding Action Items Status of documents < 5 minutes Requirements Document: As it is being proposed as an InformationalRFC, it need not be IETF last call. Schiller reports he will bring it up to IESG and expects action within a few weeks. Core Syntax and Processing: Solo's been working on editorial issues and clean up, will post something Thursday or Friday. Editors will then try a slight re-org to try to provide clarity between cryptographic syntax/processing and ObjectReference syntax/processing Signature Syntax & Processing draft questions: Securing Location/Transforms - < 20 minutes Levels of indirection, Manifests, References, ... Reagle: (working backwards): * IETF/W3C Last Call end of January * WG Last Call beginning of January * Editors work on exposition/clarity as much as possible for January last call such that we can take a stroll poll, address questions, and document minority views on the basis of concepts rendered clear (instead of ambiguities in the text.) * Accrue implementation experience and possible interop testing. Fox: XPath discussion has perhaps got us off the target, need to focus on the specification and interoperable syntax and protocol. Getting in to behavior can get confusing. Bartel: realized that XPath is used for two things: 1. sign an ancestor of the signature element. 2. programmatic document definition Boyer: The present spec fulfills his needs. Ways to do what Himes needs to do to as well, just not in the core behavior/standardized. [... light discussion/review no proposals or action items....] ACTION Fox: will check with David about the Algorithm section and perhaps make another pass through. Con call restart next year. < 5 minutes Editors should focus on clarifying the present spec. Have the call on the 9th and 16th, Eastlake will notify if he doesn't think we need a call that week. Otherwise, start back up on January 6th Face to Face meeting arrangements < 10 minutes January 21 Friday after the RSA conference. Need to get details from Rags and post by end of week. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 2 December 1999 12:52:26 UTC