- From: Barb Fox (Exchange) <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:44:33 -0700
- To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>, IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Abstracts usually include the following text: The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. -----Original Message----- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. [mailto:reagle@w3.org] Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 2:32 PM To: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG Subject: RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels RFC2119 does not have the terminology of mandatority, recommend and optional. If someone can point out the reference to me, I'd be oblidged. [RFC2119] S. Bradner. "RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels." March 1997. http://info.internet.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc2119.txt _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 1 October 1999 17:44:32 UTC