RE: Minutes 99-October-28

Sorry -- wrong question at the end --- When did it become an ATTRIBUTE (not
element).
 
jim

-----Original Message-----
From: John Boyer [mailto:jboyer@uwi.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 1:55 PM
To: Jim Schaad (Exchange); 'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'; IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG
Subject: RE: Minutes 99-October-28


See the first public draft at
 
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmldsig-core-19991020.html
<http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmldsig-core-19991020.html> 
 
John Boyer
Software Development Manager
UWI.Com -- The Internet Forms Company
  

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Schaad (Exchange)
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 1:39 PM
To: 'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'; IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG
Subject: RE: Minutes 99-October-28



>      * Location - < 10 minutes 
>        Leave an attribute but change name to HREF? 
>        Make an element with an HREF attribute? 
>        Make an element with URI content? 
>        Is it mandatory to support a non-null Location? 
> 
>        List proposal to allow the location to exist outside of 
>        SignedInfo. Call wants to keep location in the 
> signature, it is a 
>        URI (not necessarily a URL) and the call prefers the 
> employment of 
>        redirection/indirection through URIs not this syntax. 
>        Leave <ObjectReference Location=" http://www.ietf.org
<http://www.ietf.org> "> as is. 
>        Define null-location as <ObjectReference Location=""> 
> as referring 
>        to this document, must be supported. Do we extend it to mean 
>        "#ID". No: Location is URI (including null) or IDREF. 
>        (Can anyone remember the reason why we just don't use 
>        FragmentIDs?) 
> 

I must have missed something someplace -- When did location become an
attribute rather than an element?  All of the documents that I have put it
as an attribute and a quick review of the mail still has it as an element. 
When did it become an element?

jim