- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 12:58:59 -0400
- To: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I think both changes are great ideas...
Donald
From: Greg Whitehead <gwhitehead@signio.com>
Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:43:16 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Message-Id: <199910081643.MAA29771@www19.w3.org>
Message-ID: <6B962A1EE646D31193270008C7A4BAB5093388@mail.paymentnet.com>
To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>,
David Solo
<david.solo@citicorp.com>
Cc: IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:42:48 -0700
>> 6. Was think that when I replaced all '<c14nAlg Algorithm="..."'>
>> with '<CanonicalizationAlg Algorithm="..."'>, I realized it looked
>> silly. Should we make it '<Canonicalization Algorithm="...">'?
>
>I like '<Canonicalization Algorithm="...">', but it suggests that
>
> <DigestAlg Algorithm="urn:nist-gov:sha1"/>
a23bcd43</DigestAlg>
>
>Should become
>
> <Digest Algorithm="urn:nist-gov:sha1">a23bcd43"</Digest>
>
>Which I also like.
>
>-Greg
>
Received on Friday, 8 October 1999 12:59:02 UTC