w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from October to December 1999 by subject

"Package"

14 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda

16 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda

18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number)

2 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda

21 January 2000 Face to Face logistics

21 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda

28 Oct 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda

4 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda / IETF Agenda

7 Oct 99 Con Call reminder and agenda

9 Dec 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda

99-October-07 Minutes

991118 Telecon Minutes

991202 ConCall Minutes

991209 minutes

9991216 Minutes

[Moderator Action] Re: First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3

A proposal re Object/Manifest/etc.

Algorithm Granularity / Othogonality

algorithm parameters

Algorithm Specifiction/Parameters/Value

An Xpath-based Solution

AW: 18 Nov 1999 Con Call reminder and agenda (WARNING: new passcode & International number)

AW: 991118 Telecon Minutes

AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Loca

AW: AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location

AW: AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn

AW: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location

AW: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo

AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedIn

AW: Re[2]: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo

AW: Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!)

AW: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints'

Bridge Now Open

CA: Requirements Document Advancement

Call Problem

Canonicalization

Caononicalization Re: Minutes from Today's Call Please Review/Correct

Chair Announce: Face-to-Face Meeting: January 2st

Chair Announce: Latest Draft on the site

Comments for Transform

Comments on core-991001

Comments on WD-xmldsig-core-19991116

Comments on XML-Signature Core Syntax

Comments Section

conaonicalization & dsig code

Context dependency of Canonicalizatoin

core-991001: HMAC-SHA1

Correction to 19991022

Detached Signatures Vs Detached Objects

Draft Minutes

draft resulting from 990930 call

draft updates

Draft XMLDSIG WG Meeting Agenda

DSA and SHA-1 (was RE: Parameters and Algorithms. )

Easy to have multiple signatures?

Editorial Convention Rules #2

Editorial Conventions Questions

Face to Face 21 January 2000

First cut at what should say about requiring XSLT

First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4. 3.3

First draft of Section 7.6 and proposed sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.3

First Stab at Glossary

Frag ID's in URI, was RE: Minutes 99-October-28

FYI: Fragments and MIME/Types

FYI: XML v DCOM

Hash algorithms - section 5.2 of the core specification

Hashing of <0bject> </object>

Have we lost track? (re:location and transforms)

HMAC algorithm definition

How will the proliferation of micro-devices affect what can be re quired by specs?

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-00.txt

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-01.txt

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-02.txt

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-03.txt

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-02.txt

IBM Canonicalization Code

Important: 21-Oct-1999 Teleconference Minutes

Interim Syntax & Processing Draft

Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: T

Just Reconstruct (was RE: Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... ))

Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0

Latest Canonical XML Version 1.0 = WRONG DRAFT!

Latest Draft (Was: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1)

Latest draft and Schema / DTD

latest edits

latest version WD-xmldsig-core-19991217

Location shouldn't be signed!

Location=""

Locations but not Transforms as hints

Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XM

Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig N on-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')

Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-s tandard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')

Locations but not Transforms as hints (was RE: The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints')

Meeting at IETF 46 in November, Washington DC

minimal canonicalization

minor naming point (why full names are important for archivin g)

Minutes 99-October-28

minutes of 4 November 1999 telecon

Namespace, URIs, and other institutionalized names

Namespaces (Was: Re: Canonicalization)

Namespaces and URNs

NEED FEEDBACK TODAY RE: Comments for Transform

New Draft: WD-xmldsig-core-19991116.html

Non-repudiation

Normative URNS (from IANA, PEM or IPSEC)

Null Canonicalization Algorithm

ObjectReference shouldn't be signed

ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, wa

ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE:

ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location

ObjectReference shouldn't be signed, was RE: Location shouldn't be signed!

Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo

Parameterization of Transforms

parameters (was RE: latest edits )

Parameters and Algorithms.

Parser-less verifiers

Partial Signature Syntax Overview ection

PKCS#7(CMS)/XMLDSig

PKCS-7 Signature (and Envelope)

Problems with changing from document order

Processing Instructions Section / One pass processing

Publication of Working Draft / IETF-Draft

Putting ObjectReferences First

Quick Comments on Types/Encoding of XML

Re-posting of "what is minimal caonicalization" notes

Resources, Objects, Data, and Things

RFC2119 -- Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels

Schema definitions according to 19991217 Schema draft, Part 1

Signature Minutes 99-October-14

Signature Syntax and Processing Overview section

SignedInfo c14nAlg

SignedInfo Type Attribute

Signer Authentication

Simplified Syntax

Simplified Syntax (The Crux of the Matter!)

Simplified syntax proposal, was RE: Omitting Location and Transforms from SignedInfo

Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1

Source on Signer Authentication

Suggested Corrections to 10/20/99 WD

Suggested Defaults Guidelines

Suggested Security Considerations Section

Suggested top level ToC for Syntax and Procesing document

Telecon passcode invalid

Telecon today? If so, did I miss the passcode announce or is it the same as last week's.

THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!!

The real crux...

The XML-DSig Non-standard, or Location/Transforms as 'hints'

Transformations

Transforms are a mandatory part of processing (was RE: 991118 Tel econ Minutes)

Two questions about Location

URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be

URIs and digest values (was: ObjectReference shouldn't be signed)

Validity of signing n out of m items

Volunteer to do an XML schema

Who cares what MUST be signed?

Who cares what MUST be signed? (was Locations...)

Without breaking (formerly: The real crux... )

XML and canonicalization

XML Canonicalization and Syntax Constraint Considerations

XML Digital Signatures (xmldsig) for securing network event logging?

XML Signature Feedback Requested

XML-Signature Working Draft

XMLDSig Core Published as W3C Tech Report

xmldsig questions

XMLDSIG WG November Meeting at IETF Scheduled

XPath, XPointer & Re: XSLT and XSL

XSLT and XPath Become W3C Recommendations

XSLT and XSL

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 December 1999 10:07:28 UTC