- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:01:13 -0400
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: "W3c-Ietf-Xmldsig (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 23:29 99/10/28 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >I have no problem with changing the spec to say that if the specification >of Location is omitted, the signature is over the first Object in Signature, >instead of being application dependent, if the WG wants that. This seems much >better than varying from the URI spec for the null URI. I agree that we should not vary from the URI spec, but I (among others) want the meaning to remain the same: context (not first object.) _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 29 October 1999 10:01:47 UTC