- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out? Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 November)
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out? Jason Crawford (Thursday, 28 November)
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out? Joel Soderberg (Thursday, 28 November)
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out? Julian Reschke (Thursday, 28 November)
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out? Joel Soderberg (Friday, 29 November)
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out? Julian Reschke (Friday, 29 November)
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 21 November)
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check Julian Reschke (Thursday, 21 November)
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check Lisa Dusseault (Thursday, 21 November)
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 21 November)
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 21 November)
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check Clemm, Geoff (Sunday, 24 November)
RE: interop issue Lalit Jairath (Saturday, 2 November)
Re: interop issue Lalit Jairath (Friday, 1 November)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Eric Sedlar (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Lisa Dusseault (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Eric Sedlar (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Lisa Dusseault (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Eric Sedlar (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Eric Sedlar (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Eric Sedlar (Wednesday, 23 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Lisa Dusseault (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Thursday, 24 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Stefan Eissing (Friday, 25 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 October)
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Stefan Eissing (Friday, 25 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 October)
- 507 response code, was: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 October)
RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Brian Korver (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 24 October)
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 24 October)
BIND 506 status Clemm, Geoff (Friday, 11 October)
GULP (version 5) Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 10 October)
GULP (version 4) Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 7 October)
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Stefan Eissing (Wednesday, 2 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 21 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Monday, 21 October)
- Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 22 October)
- RE: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV Eric Sedlar (Friday, 15 November)
- RE: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 November)
- Re: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV Brian Korver (Saturday, 16 November)
- RE: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV Julian Reschke (Saturday, 16 November)
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 22 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 22 October)
- BIND spec, preconditions Julian Reschke (Sunday, 27 October)
- RE: BIND spec, preconditions Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 28 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Jason Crawford (Tuesday, 22 October)
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Stefan Eissing (Tuesday, 22 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 23 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Friday, 25 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Friday, 25 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Friday, 25 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Saturday, 26 October)
- Feedback for allprop/include proposal needed Julian Reschke (Saturday, 26 October)
- RE: Feedback for allprop/include proposal needed Clemm, Geoff (Sunday, 27 October)
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Elias (Monday, 28 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Sunday, 27 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 27 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 28 October)
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Elias (Monday, 28 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 28 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 28 October)
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Elias Sinderson (Wednesday, 30 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Wednesday, 30 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 31 October)
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253 Julian Reschke (Thursday, 31 October)
- RE: BIND response codes Jason Crawford (Tuesday, 15 October)
- remove me Matthew Murphy (Tuesday, 15 October)
- Re: remove me Bala Murali (Wednesday, 16 October)
- Re: remove me Meena (Wednesday, 16 October)
- RE: remove me may@latimertechnologies.co.uk (Wednesday, 16 October)
- RE: remove me Sekhar Babu, Gurgaon (Wednesday, 16 October)
- RE: remove me Harb Parhar (Wednesday, 16 October)
- RE: remove me Jiang, Chuan Wei (XSSC SGP) (Thursday, 17 October)
- RE: BIND response codes Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 15 October)
- RE: BIND response codes Clemm, Geoff (Wednesday, 16 October)
RE: Variant Support for WebDAV Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 14 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Friday, 4 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 7 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 7 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 7 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Monday, 7 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Tuesday, 8 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Wednesday, 9 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Wednesday, 9 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Thursday, 10 October)
RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Clemm, Geoff (Thursday, 10 October)
Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Wednesday, 2 October)
Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision Jason Crawford (Monday, 7 October)
Last message date: Monday, 23 December 2002 23:10:11 UTC