- From: Elias <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:36:15 -0800
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Is there some compelling reason you would use BIND to capture this relationship? It seems like this could be captured just as easily and without losing any expressiveness via the use of a "uses" property instead. Elias Clemm, Geoff wrote: > [...] > Suppose the relationship I'm capturing in a set of collections > is the "uses" relationship between software modules. This me to > use pathnames like "moda/modb/modc" to refer to the module named > modc used by the module named modb which in turn is used by the > module named moda. Since the "uses" relationship can be cyclic, > I could get a path like "moda/modb/modc/moda/...".
Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 11:44:44 UTC