Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

It seems like this draft is fine with a user-based rather than a
collection-based
system--the server will report the same usage & quota for any collection,
but
will return different results depending on who is authenticated, no?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>; "'Stefan Eissing'"
<stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>; "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt


>
> > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:56 PM
> > To: 'Stefan Eissing'; Webdav WG
> > Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Quota is applied to a collection, *not* a user, specifically because of
> > the model where a user doesn't just put documents in their own home
> > directory.  That's explicit in the draft, and it's an important feature
> > to allow directories to be shared by many users and still have quota
> > applied.  So if a quota of 1000MB is applied to the "/sales/"
> > collection, the server is free to report that quota, and count space
> > consumed by resources in the "/sales/" collection in whatever way its
> > policy decides.
>
> This kind of quota system is incompatible with the quota system in a Unix
> filesystem (where AFAIK it's per user) -- a standard proposal must be able
> to handle these kinds of systems as well.
>
> > ...
>
> Julian
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 13:23:17 UTC