- From: Jim Luther <luther.j@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:03:41 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I'd be very surprised if anyone has shipped an implementation using the "*-bytes" property names yet (I know Apple hasn't because we're waiting for a consensus on the issues), so this is probably the best time to make a name change. - Jim On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 04:57 PM, Elias Sinderson wrote: > > I agree, but at the very least a footnote should define bytes as 8-bit > bytes... It seems trivial, but I'd wager that at least one > implementation will be saved a lot of headache by this simple > definition. > > Elias > > > Jim Luther wrote: > >> On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 06:46 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> >>> The quota draft was very briefly discussed in the WG meeting >>> inAtlanta. ... >>> The second open issue was whether to rename the property names from >>> “*-bytes” to “*-octets”. The consensus of the attendees was not to >>> bother. >> >> I still think "octets" is more accurate and that is a good reason to >> use "octets" instead of "bytes". >> - Jim > > >
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 20:03:44 UTC