- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:19:33 -0700
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Clemm, Geoff'" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> "If a request would modify the state of a resource, the request MUST fail > unless the lock-token for that lock is specified in the request." This isn't much more specific than the current "is affected by" language. It leaves it entirely up to the server to decide what modifying the state of a resource is. Does modifying membership count? (Is modifying membership blocked by a depth 0 lock?) Does modifying property values count? This is exactly where clients have had problems submitting simple requests to server implementations that each have a different idea what resources have state modified by the request. lisa
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:10:59 UTC