W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: BIND method response codes

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:19:37 -0400
Message-ID: <E4F2D33B98DF7E4880884B9F0E6FDEE25ED48D@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
A problem with 200/201, is that 201 means "a new resource
was created", but a BIND never creates a new resource, but
just creates a new binding to an existing resource.  We could
of course still use 200/201, but I'd be concerned that it would
be misleading.

If a client has asked that BIND overwrite any existing binding
for that segment, why would it care whether or not there was
already a binding there?


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: BIND method response codes


similarily to the PUT method, I'd like to be able to distinguish between

- a new BIND was created (201)
- an existing BIND was overwritten (200)


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 16:20:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:27 UTC