W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253, copy and cycles

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:39:21 -0500
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF1AEABB1.0A1F9771-ON85256C64.00035815@us.ibm.com>

Even in the absense of cycles, if you are doing a copy, and there are 
diamond graphs, 

 /    \
b     c
  \   /

And d is actually a subtree, if the server does't reconstruct the diamond 
or flag the duplication,
you're going to duplicate the sub tree below d.  That might be expensive.

Do we have to require folks to reconstruct the graph?  Probably not, but 
we should
at least educate them about situations like this and encourage them to 
recreate the 


Phone: 914-784-7569
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 23:40:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:27 UTC