Tuesday, 24 December 2002
Friday, 20 December 2002
- RSVP contact info for Interim Meeting
- Preliminary agenda for Interim WG meeting
- Interim WEBDAV WG meeting: Jan 20-21, 2003, Cupertino, CA
Tuesday, 17 December 2002
Saturday, 14 December 2002
Friday, 13 December 2002
Monday, 9 December 2002
Friday, 6 December 2002
Wednesday, 4 December 2002
- RE: Please remove me from your e-mail
- Please remove me from your e-mail
- Multiple login issue
- RE: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
Tuesday, 3 December 2002
- Re: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
- Re: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
- Re (2): Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
- Re: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
- Re: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
Monday, 2 December 2002
Friday, 29 November 2002
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
Thursday, 28 November 2002
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
- RE: RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
- RE: RFC2518 issue: requiring ETags (Atlanta wg mtg)
- RE: Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
- RE: RFC2518 issue: requiring ETags (Atlanta wg mtg)
- Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg.
- RFC2518 issue: requiring ETags (Atlanta wg mtg)
- RFC2518 bis, attributes on property names -- in or out?
Sunday, 24 November 2002
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
Saturday, 23 November 2002
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
Friday, 22 November 2002
Thursday, 21 November 2002
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- Re: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- RE: Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
- Submitting lock tokens without a validity check
Wednesday, 20 November 2002
- Re: Interim WEBDAV WG meeting: Jan 20-21, 2003, Cupertino, CA
- Interim WEBDAV WG meeting: Jan 20-21, 2003, Cupertino, CA
Monday, 18 November 2002
Saturday, 16 November 2002
- RE: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV
- Re: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV
- RE: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV
Friday, 15 November 2002
Wednesday, 13 November 2002
- IETF WebDAV WG meeting -- current status of greenbytes activities
- RE: Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV
- IETF process: "draft darwinism"
Tuesday, 12 November 2002
- Informal WebDAVists supper Tuesday evening?
- RE: Agenda for WebdAV WG meeting
- RFC2518 issue: PROPPATCH response codes for protected properties
- Agenda for WebDAV WG meeting in Atlanta
Monday, 11 November 2002
Saturday, 9 November 2002
Friday, 8 November 2002
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: Re (2): WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
Thursday, 7 November 2002
- Re (2): WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- Note Well Statement
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
- Fw: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
Wednesday, 6 November 2002
Saturday, 2 November 2002
Friday, 1 November 2002
- Re: interop issue
- Destroying diamonds
- Create a Task with Webdav
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253, copy and cycles
Thursday, 31 October 2002
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
Wednesday, 30 October 2002
- Joe Kennedy/USA/StateStreet is out of the office.
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
Thursday, 10 October 2002
Monday, 28 October 2002
- RE: BIND spec, preconditions
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
Sunday, 27 October 2002
- BIND spec, preconditions
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: Feedback for allprop/include proposal needed
Saturday, 26 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: 507 response code, was: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota- 01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- 507 response code, was: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
Thursday, 24 October 2002
- FW: Protocol Action: Internationalizing Domain Names In Applications (IDNA) to Proposed Standard
- FW: text conferencing at the 55th IETF meeting in Atlanta
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
Wednesday, 23 October 2002
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re (2): FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- FW: Last call for ACL document, changes to WebDAV management
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Re: How to pronounce DAV
Tuesday, 22 October 2002
- RE: How to pronounce DAV
- FW: How to pronounce DAV
- Last Call: WebDAV Access Control Protocol to Proposed Standard
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-00.txt
- RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication?
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Impact of XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1 on WebDAV
Monday, 21 October 2002
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253
- RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication?
- RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication?
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
Sunday, 20 October 2002
Friday, 18 October 2002
- RE: Free client for testing WebDAV, DeltaV, DASL, ACL !!!
- Free client for testing WebDAV, DeltaV, DASL, ACL !!!
Thursday, 17 October 2002
Wednesday, 16 October 2002
- How to exit this list
- CFP: WWW 2003 conference
- RE: DAV:can-overwrite
- Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication?
- Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication?
- Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: remove me
- RE: remove me
- RE: BIND response codes
- RE: DAV:can-overwrite
- RE: remove me
- Re: remove me
- Re: remove me
Tuesday, 15 October 2002
- RE: BIND response codes
- remove me
- RE: BIND response codes
- Atlanta IETF WEBDAV WG meeting
- RE: BIND response codes
- RE: BIND response codes
- RE: BIND draft -- error conditions
- BIND response codes
- RE: Variant Support for WebDAV
- RE: DAV:can-overwrite
Monday, 14 October 2002
- Re: If Header: evaluation of all assertions
- RE: Limiting the scope of an untagged If Header production (was: RE: If
- Re: Limiting the scope of an untagged If Header production (was: RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions)
- RE: Limiting the scope of an untagged If Header production (was: RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions)
- RE: BIND draft -- error conditions
- RE: BIND draft -- error conditions
- BIND draft -- error conditions
- Looking for a client for testing WebDAV (+DeltaV +DASL +ACL) serv ers?
- RE: DAV:can-overwrite
- RE: Variant Support for WebDAV
- Re: Limiting the scope of an untagged If Header production (was: RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions)
- Re: If Header: evaluation of all assertions
- RE: Variant Support for WebDAV
Sunday, 13 October 2002
- RE: Limiting the scope of an untagged If Header production
- RE: Limiting the scope of an untagged If Header production (was: RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions)
- RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions
- RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions
- RE: If Header: evaluation of all assertions
Friday, 11 October 2002
- RE: BIND method response codes
- RE: BIND 506 status
- BIND 506 status
- RE: GULP (version 5.2)
- RE: GULP (version 5)
- RE: GULP (version 5)
- GULP (version 5.1)
- Re: BIND method response codes, new header?
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 5)
- RE: GULP (version 5)
- Re: GULP (version 5)
Thursday, 10 October 2002
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- GULP (version 5)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: BIND method response codes, new header?
- RE: BIND method response codes, new header?
- Re: BIND method response codes, new header?
- Re: Enabling WebDAV for home folder web sites
- Re: FW: Digest auth the wrong solution?
- RE: BIND method response codes
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- Re: BIND method response codes
- Re: GULP (version 4)
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- Re: FW: Digest auth the wrong solution?
- FW: Digest auth the wrong solution?
Wednesday, 9 October 2002
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: BIND method response codes
- BIND method response codes
- Thinking about deploying WebDAV
- Enabling WebDAV for home folder web sites
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-bind-00.txt
- Datatypes for WebDAV properties
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
Tuesday, 8 October 2002
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
Monday, 7 October 2002
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- Microsoft Content Management System vs. WebDAV
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- Re: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- RE: GULP (version 4)
- GULP (version 4)
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
Saturday, 5 October 2002
- RE: Section 7.5, lock semantics
- RE: Section 7.5, lock semantics
- Section 7.5, lock semantics
- RE: Variant Support for WebDAV
- RE: Variant Support for WebDAV
Friday, 4 October 2002
Thursday, 3 October 2002
Wednesday, 2 October 2002
- RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision
- Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision