- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:01:03 +0200
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "'Eric Sedlar'" <eric.sedlar@oracle.com>, "'Clemm, Geoff'" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:33 PM > To: 'Eric Sedlar'; 'Clemm, Geoff'; 'Webdav WG' > Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt > > > > But we *do* have implementations -- Xythos WebFile Server and Apple > iDisk both implement quota with WebDAV properties to expose the values. I just did PROPFIND/propname on http://idisk.mac.com/interop01/ (doesn't have the properties listed) and on http://www.sharemation.com/~(someusername) (doesn't have them, but does have {http://www.xythos.com/namespaces/StorageServer}quota). > This implementation experience, and the desire to have interoperability > between the clients and servers from these two implementers, led to the > writing of the draft. Which clients support it then? > Thus, the draft is fairly reliably known to work for > - the Sharemation model, where every user is given a quota tied to > their home directory but they can assign sub-quotas to sub-directories > if they want > - the iDisk model, where every user is given a home directory and a > single top-level quota > - the WFS corporate customer model, where users put their stuff in > shared directories like 'dev', 'sales', 'hr' -- and so you can *only* > measure quota by directory, not by user. > > We always have a temptation to make designs "more generally > applicable".. However sometimes I fear we fall in the trap of making the > designs too extensible, too theoretical, too much like a framework, and > in general too complex to actually reasonable accomplish what are > sometimes modest goals. But then we also sometimes fall into the trap of standardizing too early, right? There's nothing wrong in publicly describing a specific extension (actually, that's very good). But it's a big step from having something that seems to satisfy one or two server's needs, and a design that is generic enough to be considered as the generic approach for WebDAV servers. -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 18:01:36 UTC