- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:44:08 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Am Mittwoch, 23.10.02, um 21:39 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Clemm, Geoff: > Possibly we should have two pairs of standard properties: > > DAV:quota > DAV:quota-used That would be "space-left-on-device" and not a quota. Certainly every file system has it, but clients are more concerned with the per-user quotas. Do you see a need to define these properties? > DAV:current-user-quota > DAV:current-user-quota-used > > (analogous to the way the ACL draft as current-user privileges) > > Cheers, > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:00 PM > To: Brian Korver > Cc: Webdav WG > Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt > > > > Brian, > > > From: Brian Korver [mailto:briank@xythos.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:56 PM > > To: Julian Reschke > > Cc: Webdav WG > > Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > This kind of quota system is incompatible with the quota system in > a > > > Unix > > > filesystem (where AFAIK it's per user) -- a standard proposal must > be > > > able > > > to handle these kinds of systems as well. > > > > In BSD anyhow, quotas are applied to users and/or groups. That said, > > "collection quotas" (if we can even call them that) are generally > enforced > > by mounting appropriately-sized partitions. Just FYI. > > Interesting. So if we take groups into account, we'll need a more > flexible > reporting mechanism, right? > > Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 04:45:14 UTC