- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 13:48:43 -0800
- To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Current plan: I'll change it to octets. I had a hard time determining consensus on this one given the reaction at the in-person meeting. lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de [mailto:Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:44 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de > Subject: Re (2): Quota draft issues from Atlanta WG mtg. > > > Jim Luther <luther.j@apple.com> wrote: > > I'd be very surprised if anyone has shipped an implementation using the > > "*-bytes" property names yet (I know Apple hasn't because we're waiting > > for a consensus on the issues), so this is probably the best time to > > make a name change. > I agree. At first I wondered about the discussion. For me a byte had 8 > bits. > But octets avoids all discussions how many bits it has. So now would be > the > time to change. > > Cheers, Edgar > > P.S. I didn't get any reaction on some earlier posts. But I guess silence > means disagreement :-), so it's ok. > > > -- > edgar@edgarschwarz.de http://www.edgarschwarz.de > * DOSenfreie Zone. Running Active Oberon. * > Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein >
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 16:48:52 UTC