- From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 16:57:11 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
I agree, but at the very least a footnote should define bytes as 8-bit bytes... It seems trivial, but I'd wager that at least one implementation will be saved a lot of headache by this simple definition. Elias Jim Luther wrote: > On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 06:46 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > >> The quota draft was very briefly discussed in the WG meeting inAtlanta. >> ... >> The second open issue was whether to rename the property names from >> “*-bytes” to “*-octets”. The consensus of the attendees was not to >> bother. > > I still think "octets" is more accurate and that is a good reason to > use "octets" instead of "bytes". > - Jim
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 19:57:18 UTC