RE: remove me

PLease remove me


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Meena
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:55 AM
To: Bala Murali; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Subject: Re: remove me



Remove me too

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bala Murali" <BALAM@maxis.com.my>
To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: remove me


Pls remove me too.....

>>> "Matthew Murphy" <thenextbyte@attbi.com> 10/16/02 04:50AM >>>

How can I get off this list? Its not what I thought it would be about.

Matthew Murphy
Cop N Proc
1528 N Williams St
Stockton, Ca. 95205
209.271.6639 Fax 209.464.0381
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Crawford" <nn683849@smallcue.com>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>; "'Webdav WG'"
<w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: BIND response codes


>
> On Tuesday, 10/15/2002 at 07:49 ZE2, "Julian Reschke"  wrote:
> > For the same reason a Unix file system by default behaves this way.
> >
> > Hard links to collections are dangerous (loops) and in most cases
> required
> > (symlinks aka redirect refs to collections in most cases are all that's
> > required).
>
> For example, garbage collecting a file system in the presence of
> loops can be relatively expensive.
>
> I really don't want a new status code, but if we can't find an appropriate
>
> existing one, I'm tentatively supportive of Julian's proposal to add one.
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 03:40:57 UTC