- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:25:26 +0200
- To: "Jason Crawford" <nn683849@smallcue.com>, "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
- Cc: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:59 AM > To: Clemm, Geoff > Cc: 'Webdav WG' > Subject: RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision > > ... > And if it has Etag support and it's the last PUT, you might not care > care if you've lost the lock as long as the content has not > been updated. There's no point in checking for the lock in that > situation and spec'ing that the check be done anyway, just causes > needless delay. > ... Wouldn't that mean to optimize for a *really* uncommon case? How frequently does that happen? Does is really require special handling? -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 03:26:04 UTC