RE: remove me

PLEASE PLEASE remove me too..

>>> <may@latimertechnologies.co.uk> 10/16/02 12:41AM >>> 

PLease remove me 


-----Original Message----- 
From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org 
[ mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Meena 
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:55 AM 
To: Bala Murali; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org 
Subject: Re: remove me 



Remove me too 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bala Murali" < BALAM@maxis.com.my > 
To: < w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:06 PM 
Subject: Re: remove me 


Pls remove me too..... 

>>> "Matthew Murphy" < thenextbyte@attbi.com > 10/16/02 04:50AM >>> 

How can I get off this list? Its not what I thought it would be about. 

Matthew Murphy 
Cop N Proc 
1528 N Williams St 
Stockton, Ca. 95205 
209.271.6639 Fax 209.464.0381 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason Crawford" < nn683849@smallcue.com > 
To: "Julian Reschke" < julian.reschke@gmx.de > 
Cc: "Jim Whitehead" < ejw@cse.ucsc.edu >; "'Webdav WG'" 
< w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > 
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:39 PM 
Subject: RE: BIND response codes 


> 
> On Tuesday, 10/15/2002 at 07:49 ZE2, "Julian Reschke" wrote: 
> > For the same reason a Unix file system by default behaves this way. 
> > 
> > Hard links to collections are dangerous (loops) and in most cases 
> required 
> > (symlinks aka redirect refs to collections in most cases are all that's > > required). 
> 
> For example, garbage collecting a file system in the presence of 
> loops can be relatively expensive. 
> 
> I really don't want a new status code, but if we can't find an appropriate 
> 
> existing one, I'm tentatively supportive of Julian's proposal to add one. > 
> 
>