Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

I think it is a new model that multiple quotas apply to the current user
for a single resource.

If I understood you wrong and you want to report all quotas for all
users, well, I think that can be:
- a very long list
- not desirable for security/privacy reasons.

//Stefan

Am Freitag, 25.10.02, um 10:41 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Julian 
Reschke:

>> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Stefan Eissing
>> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:31 AM
>> To: Julian Reschke
>> Cc: Lisa Dusseault; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
>> Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it's not a good idea to report information about
>> "all" quota spaces in a resource:
>
> So do I.
>
>> - the resource might not know all quotas on the server
>> - you need additional information which quota applies to the
>>    current resource
>
> The intent off my proposal to report exactly the quotas that *do* 
> apply to
> the resource.
>
>> Since the reported set is likely to be incomplete (and or expensive
>> to compute), I think only one quote should be reported.
>
> If it only contains the applicable quotas, it shouldn't be harder to 
> compute
> than a single quota.
>
>> However, I do think that there is benefit in having one quota-xxx
>> property which has a XML structured value. That makes it easy to
>> extend in the future.
>>
>> //Stefan
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, 24.10.02, um 20:35 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Julian
>> Reschke:
>>
>>>
>>>> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
>>>> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 PM
>>>> To: 'Julian Reschke'; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
>>>> Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why do you think this is preferable for the client?  Why not keep
>>>
>>> It allows marshalling of multiple quota constraints (and we know that
>>> there
>>> may be more than one).
>>>
>>>> single-property, single-value?  This complicates things even for the
>>>> server.
>>>
>>> Why? For a server that enforces only a single constraint, it's just a
>>> few
>>> more XML tags to add. Where's the problem?
>>>
>>> Confused,
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> --
>>> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>

Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 04:48:15 UTC