- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:25:18 +0200
- To: "Jim Luther" <luther.j@apple.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jim Luther > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:43 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt > > > On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 09:23 AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > > > There is a > separate question of whether the units should to appear in the > property name ... I'd probably leave it off, for uniformity with > the rest of HTTP (it is the "Length" header, not the "Octet-Length" > header). > > > I like having the unit type in the name because it makes the purpose of the > property more self-described. > > However, I'm not opposed to removing the unit types from the new property > names as long the property names are NOT quota and quotaused -- > using quota > and quotaused would break Apple's existing server and client > implementations. Existing Mac OS X clients use quota and quotaused and > expect the unit size to be 512-bytes and that's what the Apple > iDisk server > returns for quota and quotaused. Well. WebDAV properties are identified using namespaces. Just do not add properties in namespaces you don't control. Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 13:25:51 UTC